摘要
在中国经济学界,越来越多的人赞同"政治经济学"与"经济学"是同一名称的不同表述这一西方主流观点。然而,这种认识并不客观。政治经济学与经济学之间虽然有密切的历史渊源,但两者在对研究对象的认识角度、范围、主体对象、方法、内容和理论结论等各个方面都存在明显区别甚至对立。这些因素相互之间构成一个结构严谨的逻辑体系,某一因素确定,其他因素也就同时确定,因此造成两个体系在各方面都不能同时兼容。两者名称的变化或取代,是以经济学发展过程中的所谓"边际革命"和主观经济学对古典经济学主流地位的取代为标志的,所以,"政治经济学"与"经济学"之间在各方面都不是等同的。由于是对同一经济现象的两个不同视角,因此各自既有客观的一面但又都是片面的;逻辑上要求的一致性,却又使得两者之间无法相互兼容和补充,这使得以追求达到"科学标准"为目标的现代经济学难以摆脱片面和狭隘。这说明,经济学研究既不存在一个公认的研究范式,更不存在能够解释一切的理论体系。
Though there are close historical origins between political economics and economics, there are obvious distinction even opposition between them in various aspects such as the recognizing angles to the objects of study, ranges, main part of the objects, methods, contents and theoretical conclusions, etc. These factors make up a well-knit logical system respedctively. Once a factor is determined, other factors will be determined at the same time. Therefore, it makes that the two systems can＇t be compatible simultaneously in various aspects. Due to the two different visual angles to the same economic phenomenon, so they individually have the objetive aspects, but are all one-sided. This indicates that economics study doesn＇t exists a generally recognized study model and also doesn＇t exists a theoretical system which can explain everything. This condition provides the significant references for the set up of economics theories with China＇s characteristics.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第12期56-63,共8页
Academic Monthly
关键词
经济学
政治经济学
研究方法
生产关系
边际革命
economics, political economics, study method, production relationship, marginal revolution
