期刊文献+

GP和NP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照临床研究 被引量:10

Riandomzed clinical navelbine plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP方案)与长春瑞滨联合顺铂(NP方案)治疗晚期NSCLC的近期疗效和毒性作用。方法105例初治晚期NSCLC患者随机分为GP组和NP组,GP组53例,NP组52例。化疗2周期后对两组的临床疗效和毒性反应进行评价。结果GP组有效率为41.5%,NP组为36.5%,两组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。GP组不良反应以血小板降低为主,NP组以静脉炎为主,均可耐受。结论吉西他滨或长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期NSCLC具有较好的耐受性和临床疗效,不良反应有所不同,但都可以耐受。 Objective Evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine or navelbine combined cisplatin with for patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods One hndred five advanced NSCLC patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, 53 in GP group and 52 in NP group. Results Patients' characteristics were similar between the two groups. The overall response rate was 41.5% in the GP group and 36.5% in the NP group. There was no statistically significant difference in response rate between the two groups (P 〉0. 05). The major cytotoxicity was thrombocytopenia in the GP group and phlebitis in the NP group. Conclusion Both GP and NP regimens are effective for advanced NSCLC and have no significant difference. The side effects of the two regimens are different but all adverse reactions are tolerable.
出处 《临床肺科杂志》 2008年第2期160-161,共2页 Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
关键词 晚期非小细胞肺癌 吉西他滨 长春瑞滨 顺铂 联合化疗 sdvanced non-small cell lung cancer gemcitabine navelbine cisplatin combined chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1王华庆,王德元.非小细胞肺癌的化疗进展[J].中国肿瘤临床,1993,20(7):548-552. 被引量:24
  • 2Tan EH, Ang PT, Wee J, et al . Vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in advanced non-small cen lung cancer[J]. Acta Oncol, 1999, 38: 619-622.
  • 3Ganz PA, Figlin RA, Haskell CM, et al. Supportive care venus supportive care and chemotherapy in metastatic non-samll-cell lung cancer: Doses chemotherapy make a difference [ J ]?Cancer, 1998,63( 1 ) : 1271-1278.
  • 4Rapp EA, Pater JL, William A, et al. Chemotherapy can prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Report d a canadian multicenter randomized trial[J]. J Clin Oncol,1998,6(3):633-641.
  • 5Non-small-cell Cancer Collaborative Group. Chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: a mata-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomized clinical trails [ J ].BMJ, 1995,311 (5) :899-909.
  • 6Klasterku J, Sculier J, Bureau G, et al. Cisplatin versus cisplatin plus etoptside in the treatment of advanced non-samll-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Party, Belgium [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,1989,7(6) :1087-1092.
  • 7Paul A, Bunn PAJr, Kelly K. New chemotherapeutic agents prolong survival and improve quality of life in Non-small-cell lung cancer:a review of the literature and future directions[J].Clin Cancer Res, 1998 ,5 ( 5 ) : 1087 -1100.
  • 8Chevalier TL, Brisgand D, Douillard JY, et al. Randomized study of vinorelbine and cisplatin venus videsine and cisplatin versus vimorelbine alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a European multicenter trail including 612 patients[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1994,12( 1 ) :306-307.
  • 9Vansteenkiste JF, De leyn PR, Deneffe GJ, et al. Vindesine-ifosfamide-platinum (VIP) induction chemotherapy in surgically staged Ⅲ A-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer:a prospective study.Leuven Lung Cancer Group[J]. Ann Oncol, 1998,9(3) :261-267.
  • 10徐瑞华,管忠震.硫酸长春地辛Ⅲ期临床试验总结[J].癌症,1998,17(3):197-200. 被引量:32

共引文献46

同被引文献73

引证文献10

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部