期刊文献+

英汉语篇逻辑结构对比研究 被引量:1

Contrastive Analysis of the Logical Structure of English-Chinese Discourses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对英汉语篇逻辑结构的对比分析进入对语言意义的研究,以逻辑分析为出发点讨论两种不同民族的思维方式和语言结构的表现形式。从逻辑连结的角度,透视英汉语篇的逻辑关系,结果显示:其主要的逻辑关系是一致的,不同之处主要在于用不用联结语;由于不少逻辑范畴的互通性,英汉语篇中的逻辑关系都可能互通和交迭,这种互通和交迭都缘于客观事物联系的复杂性及相应的逻辑范畴的多样性。 This paper makes a discussion on different ways of thinking of English and Chinese people and different expressions of language structures through contrastive analysis of logical structure and research on the language sense of English-Chinese discourses. From the logical-connection's point of view, the result of the research shows that English and Chinese discourses have an identical major logical relationship while the difference is mainly whether a conjunction is used or not; and that some logical relations in English-Chinese discourses have the features of mutual application and overlapping owing to the mutuality of some logical categories and the mutuality and the overlapping originate from the complexity of the connections among objective things and the diversity in the corresponding logical categories.
作者 陈青松
出处 《集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2008年第1期61-66,共6页 Journal of Jimei University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
关键词 英汉语篇 逻辑结构 对比分析 Engllsh-Chlnese discourse logical structure contrastive analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1胡壮麟.语篇的衔接与连贯[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,1998..
  • 2何善芬.英汉语言对比研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2003..
  • 3苗兴伟.语篇分析的进展与前沿[J].外语学刊,2006(1):44-49. 被引量:46
  • 4[5]HARTMANN R R K.Contrastive Textology:Comparative Discourse Analysis in Applied Linguistics[M].Heidelberg:Julius Groos Verlag,1980.

二级参考文献71

  • 1O'Halloran, K. (ed) 2004. Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives [A]. London: Continuum.
  • 2Aijmcr, K. & Stenstrom, A.B. 2004. Discourse Patterns in Spoken and Written Corpora [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 3Aitchison, J. & Lewis, D.M. (eds.) 2003. New Media Language [A]. London: Routledge.
  • 4Ariel, M. 2004. Accessibility Martdng: Discourse Functions, Discourse Profiles, and Processing Cues [J]. Discourse Processes. 37(2) : 91-116.
  • 5Banks, D. (ed.) 2004. Text and Texture: Systemic Functional Viewpoints on the Nature and Structure of Text[A]. Paris: L' Harmattan.
  • 6Barcelona, A. (ed.) 2000. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective [A]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 7Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (ed.) 2004. Organizational Discourse (J]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 166.
  • 8Beaver, D. 2004. The Optimization of Discourse Anaphora[J]. Linguistics and Philosophy. 27 (1) : 3-56.
  • 9Blakemorc, D. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Connectives[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Blakemore, D. 2004. Discourse Markers [C]. In Horn, L. R. & Ward, G. (eds.). 221-240.

共引文献59

同被引文献1

  • 1张培基译注.英译中国现代散文选[M]. 上海外语教育出版社, 1999

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部