期刊文献+

美沙酮维持门诊成本效益分析 被引量:14

ANALYSIS OF COSTS AND BENEFITS FOR METHADONE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]估计柳州2006年美沙酮维持门诊运作一年的成本及效益产出,探讨评价美沙酮计划的方法。[方法]在人员治疗费用、人员经费、基建投入、设备投入、工作运行、学习、培训、行政管理、人力资源等领域收集成本。在节约药物滥用费用、生产力资源、财物损失、疾病经济负担、公安司法成本等方面进行效益估计;资料收集:对包括美沙酮门诊在内的4个戒毒治疗机构进行访谈及治疗调查。对4个机构668名治疗对象的个案调查,并对禁毒、司法、劳动保障、统计、档案、公安部门进行访谈。[结果]2006年柳州美沙酮维持门诊社会成本投入为32.76万元,平均每个就诊人次成本投入5.22元。私人成本103.07万元,每个就诊人次个人成本为16.44元;美沙酮维持门诊日就诊人数为200名,日平均求诊率约40%,参加美沙酮计划后从业人数增加了8%;4种模式美沙酮维持门诊、自愿康复戒毒、强制戒毒、劳教戒毒的效益成本比率BCR值分别为:20.19﹥1.13﹥1.11﹥0.69。[结论]按照效益一成本比率大小顺序排列,比率高的美沙酮维持门诊治疗为最优方案。因此推行美沙酮门诊计划可使社会上药物滥用问题涉及的社会成本(社会资源及生产力成本和犯与财物有关罪行而言)得以减低,还可以减低药物滥用引起的疾病经济负担。 [Objective] To estimate and evaluate circannual costs and benefits of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) in the communities of Liuzhou, [Methods] By delivering questionnaires to 668 MMT clinic persons and visiting associated government departments such as drug-forbiddance, justice, work-insurance, statistic, file and public security, we acquired the expenses of treatment, personnel funds, fundamental construction, equipments and training. We also estimated the benefits of personal cost-cutting, productiivity resource, property losing, economic burden of disease, public security and justice. [Results] The benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 4 models that MMT clinic, voluntary detoxification, compulsory detoxification and detoxification in the reeducation center, was 20.19, 1.13, 1.11 and 0.69 respectively. [Conclusion] MMT clinic is the most effective program to lower the social cost and economic burden of disease induced by drug abuse.
出处 《现代预防医学》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第3期477-478,481,共3页 Modern Preventive Medicine
基金 全球基金第四轮艾滋病应用性研究项目课题(2005GF4OR006)
关键词 美涉酮维持治疗 成本 效益 Methadone maintenance treatment Cost Benefit
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1季新强,刘志民.药物滥用的成本分析[J].中国药物滥用防治杂志,2005,11(4):231-233. 被引量:3
  • 2Natinal Consensus Development Panel on Effective Medical Treatment Of Opiate Addiction [J]. JAMA, 1998, 280 (22) : 1936- 1943.
  • 3张越华,钱明年,李大拔.香港特区药物滥用的经济成本[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2001,10(4):293-297. 被引量:4
  • 4Office of National Drug Control Policy. The Economic Costs of D rug Abuse in the United States, 1992-1998[M]. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President, 2001.
  • 5余万能 胡文琳 李志恒.台湾地区药物滥用社会成本推估处报.中华公共卫生杂志,1998,17(4):360-369.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Neil Swan.Drug Abuse Cost to Society Set at $97.7 Billion,Continuing Steady Increase Since 1975.N/DA NOTES,1998,4:15-17.
  • 2Single E, Collins D, Easton B, et al.International guidelines for estimating the cost of substance abuse.Ottawa:Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, 1995.
  • 3World Health Organization (2000)International Guide for Monitoring Alcohol Consumption And Related Harm.Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence,World Health Organization:Geneva.
  • 4Office of National Drug Control Policy (2001).The Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in the United States,1992-1998.Washington, DC:Executive Office of the President(Publication No.NCJ- 190636).
  • 5Harwood H,Fountain D,Livermore G.The economic costs of alcohol and drug abuse in the United States, 1992.
  • 6Rockvile,Maryland:US Department of Health and Human Services,NIH,NIDA,Office of Science Policy and Communications,NIAAA,and Office of Policy Analysis, 1998.
  • 7Single E,Robson L,Xie X,et al.The cost of substance abusein Canada.Ottawa:Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse,1997.
  • 8Collins DJ,Lapsley HM.The Social Costs of Drug Abuse in Australia in 1988 and 1992.National Drug Strategy Monograph Series No.30.Canberra:Austmlia Goverentment Publishing Service, 1996.
  • 9Dickey B, Azeni H, Weiss R. Schizophrenia, substance use disorders and medical co-morbidity.The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 2000,3(1):27-33.
  • 10Cheung YW, Ch'ien JM, Lee A.Social costs of drug abusein Hong Kong 1998.

共引文献5

同被引文献119

引证文献14

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部