摘要
Objective： To assess the clinical efficacy of global traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） therapy in treating senile advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）, with the aim of seeking a standardized, rational and economical way to treat advanced NSCLC in old patients. Methods： A retrospective analysis and comparison was carried out in 86 patients with senile advanced NSCLC, 44 treated by global TCM （TCM group） and 42 by chemotherapy （control group） through dynamical observation on related indexes including tumor size, quality of life and the survival time, as well as on the fee for medical service at various time points in the course of the treatment. Results： The changes of tumor size, score of clinical main symptoms and behavior condition （by ZPS scoring）, as well as survival rates in the two groups at corresponding time points, were not different significantly （P〉0.05）. The mean survival time in the TCM group was 13.20 ± 1.52 months and that in the chemotherapy group was 13.45 ±1.94 months, showing insignificant difference between them. However, the median survival time in the TCM group （12 months） was actually longer than that in the chemotherapy group （9 months, P〈0.05）. The mean daily expense and the mean expense （RMB yuan） for each patient in the TCM group were significantly lower than that in the control group, which was 180.73 ±93.21 vs 825.84 ±329.63 for the mean daily expense and 34 077.21 ±14 638.04 vs 58 516.59 ±45 429.76 for the mean expense for each patient （both P〈0.01）. Conclusion： Treatment of senile advanced NSCLC with TCM alone has its apparent superiority in stabilizing tumor focus, improving clinical symptoms, elevating quality of life and prolonging the survival time. TCM is also less expensive, making it a good alternative therapeutic approach for this specific group of people.
Objective： To assess the clinical efficacy of global traditional Chinese medicine （TCM） therapy in treating senile advanced non-small cell lung cancer （NSCLC）, with the aim of seeking a standardized, rational and economical way to treat advanced NSCLC in old patients. Methods： A retrospective analysis and comparison was carried out in 86 patients with senile advanced NSCLC, 44 treated by global TCM （TCM group） and 42 by chemotherapy （control group） through dynamical observation on related indexes including tumor size, quality of life and the survival time, as well as on the fee for medical service at various time points in the course of the treatment. Results： The changes of tumor size, score of clinical main symptoms and behavior condition （by ZPS scoring）, as well as survival rates in the two groups at corresponding time points, were not different significantly （P〉0.05）. The mean survival time in the TCM group was 13.20 ± 1.52 months and that in the chemotherapy group was 13.45 ±1.94 months, showing insignificant difference between them. However, the median survival time in the TCM group （12 months） was actually longer than that in the chemotherapy group （9 months, P〈0.05）. The mean daily expense and the mean expense （RMB yuan） for each patient in the TCM group were significantly lower than that in the control group, which was 180.73 ±93.21 vs 825.84 ±329.63 for the mean daily expense and 34 077.21 ±14 638.04 vs 58 516.59 ±45 429.76 for the mean expense for each patient （both P〈0.01）. Conclusion： Treatment of senile advanced NSCLC with TCM alone has its apparent superiority in stabilizing tumor focus, improving clinical symptoms, elevating quality of life and prolonging the survival time. TCM is also less expensive, making it a good alternative therapeutic approach for this specific group of people.
