摘要
对于真正非法定目的犯的解释适用,我国刑法学界存在诸多理论盲点:真正非法定目的犯与不真正非法定目的犯不分;目的性限缩与限制解释不分;可补充的漏洞与不可补充的漏洞不分。真正非法定目的犯属于刑法隐藏漏洞,必须通过目的性限缩方法来补充。目的性限缩中的"目的性论据"不是刑法法益保护的目的,而是刑法自由保障的目的。
On the explanation application of the true illegal purpose crime, there are many academic blind spots：Confusing the true illegal purpose crime and the untrue illegal purpose crime; Confusing the purposive limiting and the limited interpretation; Confusing the supplementary loophole and the unsupplementary loophole. The true illegal purpose crime belongs to the hidden loopholes, which should be supplied by the way of purposive limiting. The difficulty of purposive limiting is to prove the ＂purposive argument ＂ has the priority over the ＂semantic argument＂. The ＂purposive argument ＂ isn＇t the pttrpese of protecting interests, but the purpose of protecting freedom.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第1期58-64,共7页
Legal Forum
关键词
真正非法定目的犯
隐藏漏洞
目的性限缩
true illegal purpose crime
hidden loophole
purposive limiting
