期刊文献+

瑞芬太尼联合氯诺昔康用于全麻患者苏醒期清醒无痛拔管 被引量:8

Remifentanil combined with lornoxicam make extubation comfortable and painless during recovery from general anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 研究瑞芬太尼、氯诺昔康单独或联合应用于全麻患者能否在苏醒期清醒、无痛拔管。方法 选取颌面部手术患者60例,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级,随机分为4组(n=15)。Ⅰ组,术毕停用瑞芬太尼;Ⅱ组,术毕瑞芬太尼减量至0.05μg/(kg·min),拔管后即停药;Ⅲ组,诱导前20min、术毕前30min分别静注氯诺昔康8mg,瑞芬太尼术毕即停药;Ⅳ组,诱导前20min、术毕前30min分别静注氯诺昔康8mg,术毕瑞芬太尼减量至0,05μg(kg·min),拔管后即停药。观察记录患者苏醒期有无呛咳、躁动,呼唤睁眼时间、拔管时间,术毕、拔管即刻、拔管后5、10min血压(BP)、心率(HR),拔管后5、10min疼痛评分采用语言评价量表(VRs)。结果Ⅱ、Ⅳ组患者呛咳发生率均明显低于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05),睁眼时间和拔管时间均比Ⅰ组稍延长(P〈0.05)。Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ组拔管即刻、拔管后5rainBP和HR均低于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05或P〈0.01),Ⅲ组和Ⅳ组在拔管后10minBP和HR仍低于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05或P〈0.01),Ⅳ组患者各时间点的BP、HR无明显差异(P〉0.05)。Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ组拔管后5minVRS评分均低于Ⅰ组(P〈0.05)。Ⅲ组和Ⅳ组拔管后10minVRS评分低于Ⅰ组或Ⅱ组(P〈0.05或P〈0.01)。结论瑞芬太尼或氯诺昔康单独应用均可降低全麻苏醒期不良反应;二者联合应用可在患者清醒、无痛条件下安全拔管。 Objective To study the efficacy of remifentanil or/and lornoxicam in reducing the adverse effects during recovery from general anesthesia. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ to Ⅱ patients aged 18 to 60 years who experienced oral or maxillofaeial operations, were divided into four groups( n = 15) : group Ⅰ (remifentanil infusion was stopped at the end of the operations), group Ⅱ (remifentanil infusion turned into 0. 05μg/( kg· min) after the completion of the operations and remained till extubation), group m (8 mg was intravenously administered at 20 min before introduction and 30 min before the completion of the operation), and group Ⅳ( remifentanil was used as group Ⅱ and lornoxicam was used as group Ⅲ ). Anesthetic induction and maintenacnce were the same in the four groups. The rate of restlessness and cough during recovery, the time of opening eyes when called, the time of extubation, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) at completion of the operations, extubation, and 5 and 10min after extubation, and the scores of verbal rating scale (VRS) at 5 and 10 min after extubation were determined. Results The cough rate in groups Ⅱ and Ⅳ was lower than that in group Ⅰ ( P 〈 0. 05 ), the times of opening eyes and of extubation were also longer than those in group Ⅰ ( P 〈 0. 05). The BP and HR in groups Ⅱ , Ⅲ and Ⅳ were significantly lower than those in group Ⅰ at extubation and 5 min after extubation ( P 〈 0. 05 or P 〈 0. 01 ), also they were lower in groups Ⅲ and Ⅳ than in groups Ⅰ at 10 min after extubation (P〈0.05 or P〈0.01), but they were steady in group Ⅳ during the recovery. Tne VRS scores were remarkably lower in group Ⅱ , Ⅲ and Ⅳ than in group Ⅰ at 5 min after extubation( P 〈 0.05) and were significantly lowerin group Ⅲ and Ⅳ thanin group Ⅰ and Ⅱ at 10 min after extubafion(P〈0.05). Conclusion Administered remifentanil or lomoxicam can reduce adverse effects during recovery from general anesthesia, and their combination makes extubation comfortable, painless and safe.
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第1期104-107,共4页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
关键词 瑞芬太尼 氯诺昔康 全麻 疼痛 拔管 Remifentanil Lomoxicam General anesthesia Pain Extubation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Mikawa K, Nishina K, Takao Y, et al. Attenuation of cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation: comparison of verapamil, lidocaine, and verapamil-lidocaine combination [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1997, 85(5) : 1005-1010.
  • 2Kurian S M, Evans R, Femandes N O, et al. The effect of an infusion of esmolol on the incidence of myocardial ischaemia during tracheal extubation following coronary artery surgery[J]. Anaesthesia, 2001, 56(12) : 1163-1168.
  • 3Kovac A L, Masiongale A. Comparison of nicardipine versus esmolol in attenuating the hemodynamic resporaes to anesthesia emergence and extubation[ J ]. J Cardiothoracic Vascular Anesthesia, 2007, 21(1):45-50.
  • 4史东平,杨跃武,封卫征,杭燕南.脑电双频指数指导气管拔管的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(2):90-92. 被引量:23
  • 5王焕亮,孙宝柱,杜洪玫,周长青,张丽.不同麻醉监测指标调控异丙酚麻醉的比较[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2006,44(5):471-474. 被引量:4
  • 6Steinlechner B, Koiniq H, Grubhofer G, et al. Postoperative analgesia with remifentanil in patients undergoing cardiac surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2005, 100(5) : 1230-1235.
  • 7张晓丽,王莉,严海,徐惠芳.氯诺昔康持续静脉输注用于全髋置换术病人术后镇痛的药代动力学[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(2):98-100. 被引量:17
  • 8caayan E, Ozkardesler S, Ozzeybek D, et al. Comparison of effects of preoperatively administered lornoxicam and tenoxicam on morphine constunption after laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2(107, 24(8):714-719.
  • 9水源,王明安,段开明,黄东,樊碧发.氯诺昔康超前镇痛对术后免疫功能的影响[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2006,12(4):210-214. 被引量:10

二级参考文献38

  • 1胡晓敏,吕阳,张小铭.硬膜外病人自控镇痛对术后患者免疫功能的影响[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2003,9(2):92-95. 被引量:14
  • 2米卫东,刘靖,曹江北,张宏.脑电双频指数与听觉诱发电位指数监测诱导期麻醉深度的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(9):515-517. 被引量:24
  • 3宗明江,赵豫华,周丽萍,常存,邢书生,李志强,李清.咪唑安定或丙泊酚伍用芬太尼对镇静深度和呼吸、循环的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(1):13-16. 被引量:50
  • 4Kreuer S,Wilhelm W,Grundmann U,et al.Narcotrend index versus bispectral index as electroencephalogram measures of anesthetic drug effect during propofol anesthesia.Anesth Analg,2004,98:692-697.
  • 5Hartley M,Vaughan RS.Problems associated with tracheal extubation.Br J Aneasth,1993,71:561-568.
  • 6Mikawa K,Nishina K,Maekawa N,et al.Attenuation of cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation:verapamil versus diltiazem.Anesth Analg,1996,82:1205-1210.
  • 7Ibrahim AE,Taraday JK,Kharasch ED.Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane,midazolam,and propofol.Anesthesiology,2001,95:1151-1159.
  • 8Kazama T,Ikeda K,MoTita K,et al.Comparision of the effectsite K(e0)s of propofol for blood pressure and EEG bispectral index in elderly and younger patients.Anesthesiology,1999,90:1517-1527.
  • 9Hitzenberger G,Radhofer-Welte S,Takacs F,et al.Pharmacokinetics of lornocicam in man.Postgrad Med J,1990,66:S22-S27.
  • 10Ankier SI,Brimelow AE,Crome P,et al.Chlortenoxicam pharmacokientics in young and elderly human volunteers.Postgrad Med J,1988,64:752-754.

共引文献49

同被引文献47

引证文献8

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部