期刊文献+

食管胃机械吻合术后胸腔内残余食管胃功能的研究 被引量:1

Function of remnant esophagus intra-thoracic stomach after gastroesophageal stapled anastomosis in excision for cardiac cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨贲门癌切除食管胃机械吻合术后胸腔内残余食管胃的功能及反流情况.方法:对41例贲门癌切除术后患者进行內窥镜检查、食管腔内压力测定和24hpH监测.结果:内窥镜检查发现吻合口上方食管黏膜有异常改变者占70.7%(29/41).测压显示41例患者术后吻合口压力低于对照组食管下括约肌和残余食管压力(P<0.05).术后组平均残余食管静息压高于对照组平均食管静息压和胸内胃的平均静息压(P<0.05);24h食管pH监测结果表明两组间pH<4的立位、卧位、pH<4总时间、反流次数等均存在统计学差异(P<0.01),卧位与立位PH<4的总时间有统计学差异(P<0.01).结论:贲门癌切除食管胃机械吻合术后,必然存在食管反流;吻合口处虽存在高压区,但不具有抗反流作用. AIM: To investigate the function of remnant esophagus intrathoracic stomach after excision for cardiac cancer undergoing gastroesophageal stapled anastomosis. METHODS: Fortyone patients were examined by endoscopy and measured by using computer manometer and 24 h pH monitoring in esophageal lumen. RESULTS: Abnomalities were found in 70.7% patients through endoscopy and pathological examination. Resting pressure under the esophagus- gastric anastomosis was higher than that in the remnant esophagus and intrathoracic stomach in the patients (P 〈 0. 05 ), and resting pressure of remnant esophagus was higher than that of normal esophagus ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was significant difference between the patients and normal people in 24 h pH monitoring (P 〈 0. 01 ). CONCLUSION: There is a high pressure zone under the esophago-gastric anastomosis, gastroesophageal reflux exists in the patients after excision for esophageal carcinoma and cardiac cancer.
出处 《第四军医大学学报》 北大核心 2008年第3期277-279,共3页 Journal of the Fourth Military Medical University
关键词 贲门肿瘤 机械吻合 测压 PH监测 cardiac cancer stapled anastomosis esophageal manometry pH-metry
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献35

  • 1王其彰,李保庆,王福顺,韩建京,杜喜群,严嘉顺,平育敏,张毓德,陈秀鉴,吴国祥.食管癌切除术后反流性食管炎[J].肿瘤防治研究,1989,16(2):73-76. 被引量:14
  • 2王其彰 张毓德 等.食管癌切除后胃重建食管的测压观察[J].中华外科杂志,1988,26(5):305-305.
  • 3王其彰.食管癌切除术后胃排空[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1988,10(4):301-301.
  • 4王其彰 张毓德 等.食管癌切除术后胃重建食管的测压观察[J].中华外科杂志,1988,26(5):305-305.
  • 5[1]Fass R, OFMAN J. Gastroesophageat reflux disease-Should we adopt new conceaptual framewark? Am J Gastroentero1,2002,97(8): 1901-1909.
  • 6[2]Ricciardolo FIM. Machanisms of citric acid-induced bromchoconstriction. Am J Med, 2001,111 ( Suppl 8A): 18-23.
  • 7[3]DeNT J, Brun J, Fendrick Am, et al; Anevidence-based apraisal of reflux disease management-the Genval workshop Report. Gut, 1999,44(suppl(2):S1-S16.
  • 8[4]Bytzer P. On-demand for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastrohepa,2001,13(suppl 1) :S19-S22.
  • 9Mathew G, Myers JC, Watson DI, et al. Motility across esophageal anastomoses after esophagectomy or gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus,1999,12(4) : 276-282.
  • 10Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, et al. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of "abnormal" contractions. Dig Dis Sci, 1987,32(6):583-592.

共引文献272

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部