期刊文献+

全球化与再地域化:欧盟城市管治的尺度重组 被引量:44

Globalisation as Reterritorialisation:The Re-scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,有关全球化的文献在学术界不断涌现,它们主要集中探讨社会关系脱离本土—地域条件的现象。然而,这些理论大多忽略了相对固定和静止的地域组织(如城市区域集群和国家)在全球化发展中所起的重要作用。本文的主要论点为,再地域化(reterritorialisation)——即各类地域组织(如城市与国家)的结构重整与尺度重组,是全球化的固有现象。本文把全球化理解为社会、经济和政治制度空间的再地域化,以及这种再地域化与外在多重地理尺度相互交织的过程。城市空间和国家机器等地域组织与全球化互为因果。它们既是全球化的前提,也是全球化作用于地方的载体与结果。因此,当代欧洲城市管治应该理解为一种"尺度的政治"(politicsofscale),是城市转型与国家地域重构相互作用的产物。 In the rapidly growing literatures on globalisation, many authors have emphasised the apparent disembedding of social relations from their local-territorial pre-conditions. However, such arguments neglect the relatively fixed and immobile forms of territorial organisation upon which the current round of globalisation is premised, such as urban-regional agglomerations and territorial states. This article argues that processes of reterritorialisation-the reconfiguration and re-scaling of forms of territorial organisation such as cities and states-constitute an intrinsic moment of the current round of globalisation. Globalisation is conceived here as a reterritorialisation of both socioeconomic and political-institutional spaces that unfolds simultaneously upon multiple, superimposed geographical scales. The territorial organisation of contemporary urban spaces and state institutions must be viewed at once as a presupposition, a medium and an outcome of this highly conflictual dynamic of global spatial restructuring. On this basis, various dimensions of urban governance in contemporary Europe are analysed as expressions of a politics of scale that is emerging at the geographical interface between processes of urban restructuring and state territorial restructuring.
出处 《国际城市规划》 CSSCI 2008年第1期4-14,共11页 Urban Planning International
  • 相关文献

参考文献111

  • 1[1]Albrechts L and Swyngedouw E.The Challenges for Regional Policy Under a Flexible Regime of Accumulation[M]/I L Alhrechts.Regional Policy at the Crossroads:European Perspectives.London:Jessica Kingsley,1989.
  • 2[2]Albrow M.The Global Age:State and Society Beyond Modernity[M].Oxford:Polity,1996.
  • 3[3]Altvater E.Fordist and Post-Fordist International Division of Labor and Monetary regimes[M] //M Storpor and A J Scott.Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development.New York:Routledge,1992.
  • 4[4]Altvater E and Mahnkopf B.Grenzen der Globaliseriung[M].Münster:Westfalisches Dampfboot,1996.
  • 5[5]Amin A and Thrift N.Neo-Marshallian Nodes in Global Networks[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,1992,16:571-587.
  • 6[6]Amin A and Thrif N.Living in the global[M]// A Amin and N Thrift.Globalization,Institutions and Regional Development in Europe.New York:Oxford University Press,1994.
  • 7[7]Anderson J.The Shifting Stage of Politics:new medieval and postmodern territorialities?[J].Environment and Planning D,1996,14:133-153.
  • 8[8]Appadurai A.Modernity at Large:Cultural Dimension s of Globalization[M].Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press,1996.
  • 9[9]Arrighi G.The Long Twentieth Century[M].New York:Verso,1994.
  • 10[10]Braudel F.The Perspective of the World[M].trans.Sian Reynolds.Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press,1984.

同被引文献733

引证文献44

二级引证文献629

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部