1Shah A, Wagner GS, Granger CB, et al. Prognostic implications of TIMI flow grade in the infarct related artery compared with continuous 12 - lead ST - segment resolution analysis. Reexamining the " gold standard" for myocardial reperfusion assessment [ J ]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000, 35 (3) :666 - 672.
2Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. The TIMI frame count : a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow [J]. Circulation, 1996,93(5):879 -888.
3Porto I, Burzotta F, Brancati M, et al. Relation of myocardial blush grade to microvascular perfusion and myocardial infarct size after primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention [ J ]. Am J Cardiol,2007,99 (12) : 1671 - 163.
4Stone GW, Peterson MA, Lansky A J, et al. Impact of normalized myocardial perfusion after successful angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction[J]. J Am Coil Cardiol,2002, 39(4) :591 -596.
5Henrique JPS, Zijlstra F, vant Hof AWJ, et al. Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade [ J ]. Circulation ,2003,107 (2) :2115 -2119.
6Korosoglou G, Haars A, Michael G, et al. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial blush to assess tissue level reperfusion in patients with acute ST - elevation myocardial infarction: incremental prognostic value compared with visual assessment[J]. Am Heart J,2007,153(4) :612 -620.
7Lombardo A, Rizzello V, Galiuto L, et al. Assessment of resting perfusion defects in patients with acute myocardial infarction : comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography, combined first - pass/delayed contrast - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and o^99mTc -sestamibi SPECT[J]. Int J Cardiovasc imaging, 2006,22(3 -4) :417 -428.
8Bolognese L, Carrabba N, Parodi G, et al. Impact of microvascular dysfunction on left ventricular remodeling and long - term clinical outcome after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction [ J ]. Circulation, 2004,109(9) :1121 - 1126.
9Choi EY, Seo HS, Park S, et al. Prediction of transmural extent of infarction with contrast echocardiographically derived index of myocardial blood flow and myocardial blood volume fraction: comparison with contrast - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [ J ]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2006,19 (10) :1211 -219.
10Biagini E, van Geuns R J, Baks T,et al. Comparison between contrast echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging to predict improvement of myocardial function after primary coronary intervention[ J ]. Am J Cardiol, 2006,97 ( 3 ) : 361 - 366.
