技术能力与企业出口绩效间关系的经验性研究被引量：3

An Empirical Study on the Technological Capabilities on Export Performance

下载PDF

导出

摘要文章通过对我国制造业企业技术能力与出口绩效关系的实证研究发现,技术人员比重对出口绩效存在负面影响;技术创新能力对出口绩效没有影响;而信息技术与技术性人力资源和技术创新能力的交叉作用均对出口绩效产生了显著而积极的作用。本研究反映出我国制造业企业在国际市场上缺乏技术竞争优势。同时,文章认为我国外向型企业在实施国际化战略时,必须重视对自身信息技术的投入。 The paper empirically examines the impact of the technological capabilities on export performance. Results suggest that technical intensity of human resource has adverse impact on export performance; R＆D has no impact on export performance, while the interaction of IT with technical human resource and with R＆D has positive impact on export performance. The paper reiteratively reflects that the technological competitive advantages of China manufacturing firms are weak. The paper suggests that our outward firms should pay more attention to the infrastructures of information technology at the process of intemationalization.

作者谢军

机构地区广东商学院管理学院

出处《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2008年第1期108-111,共4页 East China Economic Management

关键词技术能力出口绩效组织能力理论 technological capabilities export performance organization capabilities

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1范晓屏.市场导向与出口绩效关系的研究[J].国际贸易问题,2004(3):32-37. 被引量：4
2王昌林.产业技术创新绩效与产业出口竞争力[J].工业技术经济,2006,25(1):104-106. 被引量：8
3韦苏倢.产业创新与广西出口产业竞争优势培育[J].经济论坛,2005(5):27-28. 被引量：2
4赵勇,陈冬.信息技术的生产率悖论因果分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2004,25(6):100-103. 被引量：15
5Afuah A. Mapping Technological Capabilities into Product Markets and Competitive Advantage: the Case of Cholesterol Drugs [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23 : 171 - 179.
6Bharadwal AS. A Resource- Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation [ J ]. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24 ( 1 ) : 169 - 196.
7Chetty SK, Hamilton RT. Firm-level Determinants of Export Performance : A Meta - Analysis [ J ]. International Marketing Review, 1993, 10 (3): 26-34.
8Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL. Information Technology and Economic Performance: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence [ J ]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2003, 35 (1): 1-28.
9Grant RM. Prospering in Dynamically- competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration [J]. Organization Science, 1996, 7 (4) : 375 -387.
10Hatch NW, Dyer JH. Hunmn Capital and Learning as a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2004, 25:1155 1178.

二级参考文献37

1Levitt, Theodore , "Marketing Myopia" , Harvard Business Review, July-August, 1960.
2Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, October, 1990.
3Kohli, A. K., & Jawomki, B. J. Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, April 1990.
4Day, G. S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations.Marketing science institute commentary. Report #93-123. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute,1993.
5Sinkula, J. M.. Market information processing and organizational learning. Journal of Marketing, January,1994.
6Walker, L. J. Market orientation as a dual component process of customer and competitor orientations Doctoral dissertation.Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University,1997.
7Cameron K. S. and D. A. Whetten, "Organizational Effectiveness: One Model or Several?" in K. S. Cameron & D. A.Whetten (eds) , Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Muhlple Methods, New York, Academic Press, 1983.
8Venkatraman N. and Vasudevan Ramanujam, "Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches" , Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, No. 4.1986.
9Styles, C. and Ambler, T. "Successful Export Practice:The UK Experience" , International Marketing Review, Vol. 11, No.6, pp 23-47, 1994.
10Doyle, P., & Hooley, G.J. "Strategic Orientation and Corporate Performance" . International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 59-73, 1992.