摘要
目的:比较宫腔较大妇女放置GyneFix IN IUD(吉妮IUD)和MCu IUD(爱母IUD)的临床使用效果。方法:选择既往有1次或2次以上脱器史及带器妊娠史,且自愿放置新型IUD的宫腔较大(9～10cm)已婚育龄妇女220例,随机分为两组,分别放置吉妮IUD和爱母IUD,并进行24个月随访观察。结果:吉妮IUD组因症取出率、终止使用率低于爱母IUD组,两者比较差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。结论:吉妮IUD对宫腔较大妇女更具可接受性。
Objective： To compare the clinical effect and side effects of GyneFixTM IN IUD and MCu IUD in women with big uterine canal. Methods： 220 cases of childbearing - aged married women with big uterine canal （9 - 10cm） who resulted from IUD expulsion and pregnancy with IUD for more than once or twice and volunteered to receive the placement of a new type of IUD were divided into two groups（each for 110 cases）, and were inserted GynefixTM IN IUD and MCu IUD, respectively. Follow - up survey had been continued for 24 months. Results ： The extraction rate due to complications and the failure rate of GynefixTM IN IUD were lower than that of MCu IUD, and the differences were significant （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion ： GyneFixTM IN IUD is more acceptable to women with big uterine canal.
出处
《中国计划生育学杂志》
北大核心
2008年第2期102-104,共3页
Chinese Journal of Family Planning
关键词
吉妮IUD
爱母IUD
临床效果
Big uterine canal
Gyne Fix TM IN IUD
MCu IUD
Clinical efficacy
