期刊文献+

促进R&D活动的税收和补贴政策工具的有效搭配 被引量:43

The Effective Combination of Tax and Subsidy Policy to Promote R&D Activities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现有的R&D竞争方式、合作方式以及在此基础上的事前补贴措施或者与事后税收相互搭配的措施也只能在某种程度上改善R&D活动的市场失灵,而无法带来社会所期望的结果,它们不能完全根治市场机制在激励R&D活动方面所产生的失灵—即很难存在最优的市场结构驱动企业从事社会所期望的R&D活动以及完全消除R&D活动的知识溢出。既然R&D活动所产生的市场失灵是由于市场结构和R&D活动的溢出造成的,那么根治的"药方"也应遵从这一思路出发,对企业从事的R&D活动进行事前补贴和事后补贴搭配:事前补贴主要弥补企业从事R&D活动时信息溢出所带来的损失,事后补贴则主要解决市场结构导致创新产品竞争的不充分,这两种政策措施的有效搭配是为了试图消除R&D活动在研究阶段以及开发阶段的市场失灵,以引导企业从事社会所期望的R&D活动。 Although the existing types of R&D competition and cooperation or on these based types of subsidy and tax policies may improve the inner failure of market system on some degree, they can not realize the socially desirable result, which they can not completely effect a radical cure of the market failure for encouraging the R&D activities, because there is not the optimal market structure to drive the firms engage the socially desirable R&D activities, and they can not completely eliminate the knowledge spillovers of R&D activities. Since the market failure of R&D activities are resulted by the market structure and the knowledge spillovers, we should eliminate the negative impact on the R&D activities. By this way we take some measure for imposing the ex ante and post subsidy on the firms' R&D activities, the ex ante subsidy mainly compensate the loss inflicted by the R&D spillovers, while the post subsidy mainly solve the insufficient competition of innovating products in the market system, and this police effectively arranging in pairs is trying for eliminating the market failure of R&D activities on the research stage and the development stage, so as to spur the firms realize the socially desirable R&D activities.
出处 《产业经济研究》 CSSCI 2008年第1期26-36,共11页 Industrial Economics Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金“基于吸收能力与激励政策互补关系的技术创新体系研究”(项目编号:07JA790042) 湖北省教育厅科学技术研究项目“自主创新战略下湖北省技术对外依存度的研究”(项目编号:D200719002)的资助
关键词 R&D 事前补贴 事后补贴 溢出 R&D ex ante subsidy post subsidy spillovers
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1[1]SCHUMPETER J A.Capitalism,socialism and democracy[M].Lndon:Allen and Unwin,1943.
  • 2[2]PORTER M.The competitive advantage of nations[M].New York:Free Press,1990.
  • 3[3]ARROW K.Economic weifare and allocations of resources for invention[M].National Bureau of Economic Research,Princeton University Press,Princeton.1962.
  • 4[4]DASGUPTA P,J STIGLITZ.Industrial structure and the nature of innovation activity[J].Economic Journal,1980,90,pp.266-293.
  • 5[5]DASGUPTA P,J STIGLITZ.Uncertainty,industrial structure and the speed of R&D[J].Bell Journal of Economics,1980,11,PP.1-28.
  • 6[6]SPENCE M.Cost reduction,competition and industry performance[J].Econometrica,1984,52,101-121.
  • 7[7]DAMIANO B S.The economics of cooperation and competition in research and development:a survey[R].2003,Working paper.
  • 8[8]PAVITT K.Academic research,technical change and government policy.In:J.Krige and D.Pestre(eds),Science in the Twentieth Century;Amsterdam:Harwood Academic,1997,pp 143-158.
  • 9[9]MARTIN S,SCOTT J T.The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation[J].Research Policy,2000,29:437-47.
  • 10[10]D'ASPREMONT C,A JACQUEMIN.Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers[J].American Economic Review,1988,78:1133-1137.

二级参考文献27

  • 1贾蔚文 陈晓田 等.技术创新的机制和政策研究.技术创新十年[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.42-57.
  • 2斯蒂芬·马丁.《高级产业经济学》[M].上海财经大学出版社,2003年版..
  • 3Lerner, J., The Government as Venture Capitalist: The long run impact of the SBIR program[J], Journal of business, Vol, 72: 285-318, 1999.
  • 4Lucas, Robert E. , jr, On the Mechanics of Economic Development [J], Journal of Monetary Economic Review, 80: 92-96, 1988.
  • 5Mansfield, et al, Social and private rates of Return from Industrial Innovations [J], Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91: 221-240, 1977.
  • 6Romer, Paul M. , Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy [J], 98 : 71-102, 1990.
  • 7Schumpeter, J. , Theory of Economic Development [M]. New York - Oxford University Press,First edition, 1961.
  • 8Solow, Robert M. , A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth [M], Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70: 65-94, 1956.
  • 9Spence, M., Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance [M], Econometric 52:101-121, 1984.
  • 10Jones, Charles I., and Williams, John C., Measuring the social return to R&D [J], Federal Reserve Board, Washionton, DC, 1977.

共引文献92

同被引文献732

引证文献43

二级引证文献1820

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部