摘要
社会建构主义与本质主义是解释性别差异的两种基本观点。现代社会的实践更多采用建构取向造成男女两种性别的趋同。然而从择偶标准的确立可以发现男性对女性与女性对男性的要求依然遵循传统文化的规定性。在这一基础上分析可见建构主义与本质主义有其合理性也存在误区,应该建立超越二者的性别平等的建构路径。
Social constructionism and essentialism are two basic opinions to explain gender difference. The practice in modern society uses constructional prospective which causes the similarity between male and female. But we can learn from the standard of choosing spouse that the mutual request from female and female still abides the traditional culture. On this basis, the thesis explores the rationality and shortcoming of social constructionism and essentialism, and puts up the approach beyond them.
出处
《沈阳师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
2008年第1期20-22,共3页
Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
建构
本质
择偶
社会性别
性别平等
construction
essence
choosing spouse
social gender,gender equality
