交换威胁、技术寻求与无技术优势企业对外直接投资被引量：13

Exchange Threat,Technology-seeking and the Outward FDI of Enterprises without Technology Advantages

下载PDF

导出

摘要 20世纪80年代以来,技术获取型对外直接投资日益突出。在Fosfuri、Motta与Graham研究的基础上,本文以当地化溢出为前提,引入企业的R&D活动,构建两国双寡头古诺模型,从交换威胁战略和技术寻求动机的角度论证无技术优势企业对外直接投资,首次解释了发达国家和发展中国家的企业所进行的技术获取型对外直接投资,并且建议我国企业增加R&D投入,加大对新兴工业化国家和地区的直接投资力度。 Technology acquisition foreign direct investment has been surged since1980's.Based on the studies of Fosfuri,Motta and Graham,the paper introduces R&D activities of enterprises on the premise of localized spillovers,and construct a two-country duopoly Cournot mode.It proves the outward FDI of the enterprises without technology advantages in view of the exchange threat and technology-seeking.Thus it explains the technology acquisition FDI coming from the enterprises in developed and developing countries.The suggestion is put forward that Chinese enterpriese should increase investment in R&D activities and enhance the direct investment towards the newly industrialized countries and regions.

作者曾剑云刘海云符安平

机构地区华中科技大学

出处《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第2期54-59,73,共7页 World Economy Studies

基金国家985工程哲学社会科学创新基地研究项目"科技发展与人文精神"的子项目"自主创新与对外投资"的阶段性成果之一

关键词交换威胁战略技术寻求动机无技术优势企业对外直接投资

分类号 F273.1 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1联合国贸易与发展会议.2005世界投资报告:跨国公司和研发全球化.冼国明等译.北京:中国财政经济出版社,2006.
2B. Kogut, S. , and J Chang. Technological Capabilities and Japanese Direct Investment in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1991,73 ( 3 ) : 401-413.
3Wei Jianshan, and Jaeyong Song. Foreign Direct Investment and the Sourcing of Technological Advantages : Evidence from the Biotechnology Industry. Journal of Business Studies,1997, 28(2) :267-284.
4D. Neven, and G. Siotis. Technology Sourcing and FDI in the EC : an Empirical Evaluation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1996,14 ( 5 ) : 543 -560.
5RacheI Griffith, Rupert Harrision, and John Van. Recnan. How Special is the Special Relativeship? Using the Impact of U. S R&D Spillovers on the U. K Finns as a Test of Technology Sourcing. The American Economic Review, 2006,96 ( 5 ) : 1859-1875.
6A John Cantwell, John H. Dunning , and Odile E. M. Janne. Towards a Technology-seeking Explanation of U. S. Direct Investment in the United Kingdom. Journal of International Economics,2004,10 ( 1 ) :5-20.
7Andrea Fosfuri, and Massimo. Motta. Multinational without Advantages. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1999, 101 (4) :617-630.
8H. Gorg , and D. Greenaway. Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Finns Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment. The World Bank Research Observer,2004,19 (2) : 171-197.
9W. Cohen, and D. Levinthal. Innovation and Learning :the Two Faces of R&D. Economic Journal , 1989,99 (397) :569- 596.
10Maria-Luisa Petit, and Francesca. Sanna-Randaccio. Endogenous R&D and Foreign Direct Investment in International Oligopolies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2000,18 (2) :339-367.