2Manning KE, Yu DC, Yu HC, et al. Factors to consider for predictable post and core build-ups of endodontically treated teeth. Part Ⅰ; Basic theoretical concepts. J Can Dent Assoc, 1995, 61(8) :685-688.
5Martinez-Insua A, da Sliva L, Rilo B, et al. Comparison of the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent, 1998, 80(5) :527-532.
4Hochman N, Zalking MJ. New all-ceramic indirect post-core system[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1999,81(5):625-629.
5Stewardson DA. No-metal post system[J]. Dent Update, 2001,128(9):326-336.
6Love RM, Purton DG The effect of serrations on carbon fibre post-retention within the root canal, core retention, and post rigidity[J]. Int J prosthodont, 1996,9(5):488-488.
7Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, et al. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resinposts[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1998,80(2):151-157.
8Sidoli GE, King DA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1997,78(1):5-9.
9Boudrias P, Sakkal S, Petrova Y. Anatomical post design meets quartz fiber technology:rationale and case report[J]. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2001,22(4):337-40,342,344 passim; quiz 350.
10Standford JW, Weigel KV, Paffenberg GC, et al.Compressive properties of hard tooth tissue[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 1960,60:746-756
