1Holmstrom.B. Managerial Incentive Problem-A dynamic Perspective. in Essays in Economics and Management in Honor of Lars,1982.
2Mirrlees,J. A. The Theory of Moral Hazard and Unobservable Behavior:Part Ⅰ. Review of Economic Studies,1999,(66).
3Abraham, h. and N. Pavoni. Efficient Allocations with Moral Hazard and Hidden Borrowing and Lending. working paper,University College London, 2003.
4Detemple,J. ,S. Govindaraj,and M. Loewenstein. Optimal Contracts and Intertemporal Incentives with Hidden Actions. working paper,Boston University, 2001.
5Schattler,H. and J. Sung. The First-Order Approach to the Continuous-Time Principal-Agent Problem with Exponential Utility. Journal of Economic Theory, 1993,(61).
6Mirrless. J. The Optimal structure of Authority and Incentives within an organization. Bell Journal of economics,1976.
7Radner. R. Monitoring Cooperative agreement in a Repeated Principal-Agent Relationship. Econometrica,1981,(49).
同被引文献38
1刘炳春.服务型制造网络协调机制研究[D].天津:天津大学,2011.
2AL-Najjar N. Incentive contracts in two-sided moral haz- ards with multiple agents [ J ]. Journal of Economic Theo- ry, 1997,74( 1 ) : 174 - 195.
3Srabana G, Richard E R. Monitoring the principal with multiple agents[ J]. Rand Journal of Economics, 1998,29 (2) :233 -248.
4Li S H, Zhang W Y. Optimal assignment of principal ship in terms[ J ]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organiza- tion,2001,44( 1 ) :105 - 127.
5Attara, Campioni E, Piaser G. On multiple-principal multi- pal-agent models of moral hazard [ J ]. Games and Eco- nomic Behavior,2010,68 ( I ) :376 - 380.
6Maury, Pajuste. Multiple Large Shareholders and Firm Value [ J ]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2005,29 (7) : 1 813-1 834.
7帕特里克·博尔顿,马赛厄斯·德瓦特里庞.合同理论[M].上海:格致出版社,2008.
8Celik G. Mechanism design with collusive supervision [ J]. Journal of Economic Theory,2009,144( 1 ) :69 - 95.
9Winoto p, Tang T Y. collusion-proof mechanism [ J ]. Data Mining and Intelligent Information Technology Applica- tions(ICMiA) ,2011,3( 1 ) :274 - 279.
10Baldwin C Y, Clark K B. Managing in an age of modulari- ty [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 1997,75 (5) : 84 - 93.
