摘要
目的:比较和评价Carisolv去龋技术和采用低速牙钻去龋治疗乳牙龋病的效果和患儿接受程度。方法:选择年龄6～10岁,双侧乳牙均患中龋的儿童100名,以自身半口为对照,分别用Carisolv和牙钻去龋,然后用复合体充填,记录去龋时间。采用问卷调查患儿对两种去龋方法的接受程度,1年后复查,观察修复体的情况。结果:Carisolv去龋时间(4.36±1.28)min长于低速牙钻去龋时间(2.60±0.84)min。82%的患儿认为Carisolv去龋疼痛轻于牙钻;多数患儿倾向使用Carisolv去龋。1年后复查表明Carisolv和牙钻去龋的修复体继发龋率、脱落率方面无显著性差异。结论:Carisolv去龋时患儿疼痛程度明显减轻,但去龋时间略长于牙钻去龋,多数患儿倾向于Carisolv去龋。Carisolv修复术后的继发龋率并未增加。
AIM： To compare the efficiency of Carisolv removing the caries with that of drilling in deciduous teeth, and if the children accept it. METHODS ： One hundred children, aged from 6 to 10 years old, with symmetric coronal medium caries in deciduous teeth, were involved in this clinical study. According to a split - mouth design, in each patient caries tissue was removed by using a bur on one side, and Carisolv on the other side. After the carise was removed（wrote down the consumed time） the teeth were restored with composite resin. Patients were asked to fill in a postoperative questionnaire, including the degrade of patients acceptance of the technique preference. The result was cheeked after one year. RESULTS： The time（min） for Carisolv removing caries was more than drilling method were 4. 58 ± 1.27and 2.78±0.86, respectively. The patients felt less pain（82% ） in the operation by Carisolv than by drilling. The major patients preferred Carisolv to bur. In 1 - year follow - up there was no significant difference in the incidence of secondary caries and restoration lost between Carisolv and drilling treatment. CONCLUSION： Carisolv is a time - consuming technique but the majority of patients accept it because of less pain. Carisolv may have no effect on the secondary caries.
出处
《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》
CAS
2008年第2期101-103,共3页
Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金
省卫生厅资助项目(2004-099)
关键词
化学机械除腐
继发龋
龋齿
chemical caries remove
mechanical caries remove
secondary caries
