1Fenando IN, Moskovic E, Fryatt I, et al. Is there still a role for lymphography in the management of early stage carcinoma of the cervix ? [J]. Br J Radiol,1994, 67:1052-1056.
2Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma [J]. Am J Roentgenol,2000, 175 (3) :759-766.
5Oglno I, Okamoto N, Andoh K, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in stage IIB-IVA cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy: value of computed tomography [ J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1997,37 (5) : 1071-1077.
6Bipat S, Glas AS,van der Velden J,et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma : a systematic review [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 2003,91 ( 1 ) :59-66.
7Pannu HK, Fishman EK. Evaluation of cervical cancer by computed tomography: current status [J]. Cancer, 2003, 98 (9 Suppl) : 2039-2043.
8Kim SH, Kim SC,Choi BI,et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging [ J]. Radiology, 1994, 190(3):807-811.
9Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG, et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23 (12) : 2813-2821.
10Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ, et al. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 2004, 95(3) :546-551.
2[1]Fernando IN,Moskovic E, Fryatt I,et al. Is there still a role for lymphography in the management of early stage carcinoma ofthe cervix[J]? Br J Radiol,1994,67:1052-1056
3[2]Maranzano E, Latini P, Checcaglini F, et al. Role of lymphan giography and abdomino-pelvic CT in uterine tumors[J]. Radiol Med(Torino), 1990,79:599-602
4[3]La Fianza A, Dore R, Di Giulio G, et al. Lymph node metasta sis ofcarcinoma ofthe cervix uteri. Role of lymphography andcomputerized tomography[ J ]. Radiol Med(Torino ), 1990,80: 486491
5[4]Beyersdorff D, Bahnsen J, Frischbier HJ. Nodal involvement in cancer of the uterine cervix: value of lymphography and MRI [J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 1995,16:274-277
6[5]Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, et al. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer[J]. JAMA, 1997,278:1096-1101
7Yu KK, Forstner R, Hricak H. Cervical carcinoma: role of imaging.Abdom Imaging, 1997, 22:208-215.
8Kim SH, Choi BI, Hart JK, et al. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 1993, 17:633-640.
9Yang WT, Lain WW, Yu MY, et al. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000, 175:759-766.
10Yang WT, Walkden SB, Ho S, et al. Transrectal ultrasound in the evaluation of cervical carcinoma and comparison with spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol, 1996,69:610-616.
5Rose PG, Bundy BN, atkins EB, et al. Concurrent cisplatinbased radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 1999, 340(4): 1144-1153.
6Ikushima H, Osaki K, Furutani S, et al. Chemoradiation therapy for cervical cancer: toxicity of concurrent weekly cisplatin[J]. Radiat Med, 2006, 24(6):115-121.
7Lanciano R, Calkins A, Bundy BN, et al. Randomized comparison of weekly cisplatin or protracted venous infusion of fluorouracil in combination with pelvic radiation in advanced cervix cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(4): 8289-8295.
8Chen SW, Liang JA, Hung YC, et al. Concurrent weekly cisplatin plus external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy for advanced cervical cancer: a control cohort comparison with radiation alone on treatment outcome and complications[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006,66(11): 1370-1377.
