摘要
我国宪法学界和民法学界曾就《物权法》(草案)没有规定"根据宪法,制定本法"是否属于形式违宪,展开过激烈的争论,而且这种争论并没有因《物权法》的通过而停息。分析双方共识难以达成的原因,进而找出一个较为合理的答案就显得重要而紧迫。尽管民法学出于对法治的向往和对市民社会的渴望,但由于选择了一种不是很合适的论证路径和方式,因而得出了一个值得商榷的结论。毫无疑问,在一国的法律体系中,只有宪法才是"惟一根本法"。但是,"宪法是根本法"却并不意味着一定要在法律制定中有诸如"根据宪法,制定本法"之类的条款,宪法学界在此问题上的坚守可能是对"宪法是根本法"这一命题的误解。围绕《物权法》的制定所生发出来的学术争鸣既折射了我国法治建设所面临的种种复杂与艰难之境遇,也彰显了学科之间进行交流与沟通的必要性。
Whether the form of the drafted Law of the Real Right has violated the Constitution as the sentence that ＂according to the Constitution, this law is enacted＂ is not written, there was a heated argument between the field of the civil law and the field of the constitutional law in China, and the fierce argument had been lasting for long and still continues even now after the Law of Real Right has been passed. It is important and urgent to analyze the reasons why it was hard for both parties to reach a common understanding about the argument and find a reasonable answer. Although the civil law has fully shown the desire towards the rule of law and the civil society, it has chosen a not-very-proper approach of demonstration and therefore has come to some deliberated conclusions. Undoubtedly, in the law system of one country, the Constitution is the only fundamental law. However, the demonstration of the Constitution being fundamental does not mean that the sentence that ＂according to the Constitution, this law is enacted＂ should be written in the law. That the field of the constitutional law sticks to writing this sentence shows their misunderstanding towards the Constitution being fundamental. So the argument not only reflects the rule of law in our country facing complex and difficult situation, but also indicates the necessity of communications between different fields of the law.
出处
《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第2期129-138,共10页
Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition
基金
国家社科基金项目"构建社会主义和谐社会中的宪政建设研究"(06BFX014)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
物权法
宪法与民法的关系
根本法
人权保障
The Law of the Real Right
the relationship between the civil law and the constitutional law
the fundamental law
human rights protection
