期刊文献+

运用WTP值与WTA值对游憩资源非使用价值的货币估价--以黄果树风景区为例进行实证分析 被引量:47

Monetary Valuation of the Non-Use Value of Recreational Resources in Huangguoshu Scenical Resort based on WTP and WTA Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 首先,本文依据环境经济学的理论原理,采用平均值估计和多重线性对数模型,分别推算出黄果树风景区的WTP值90.52元/人和102.81元/人、WTA值175.06元/人和129.05元,人。经分析,认为虽然WTP值和WTA值都可用于评估黄果树游憩资源的非使用价值,但WTA值更适合于评估我国游憩资源的非使用价值。这样,以2005年黄果树来访游客数225×10^4人次作为统计母本,其游憩资源的非使用价值在2.90×10^8—3.94×10^8元之间。其次。对WTA值与WTP值进行比较,得到WTA,WTP的比值为1.93、1.26。通过分析探讨,认为引起该比值差的因素,主要有赋予效应与厌恶效应、收入效应与替代效应、模糊性与不确定性和赔偿效应等。同时,认为通过谊类评价研究,可了解和促进公民参与环境保护的意识,能为政府和经营企业进行环境保护提供参考性数据。 In this paper, the methods of mean computation and linear logarithm model are used to calculate the WTP Value and the WTA value in Huangguoshu Scenical Resort based on the principles of environmental economics. The results show that WTP value is 90.52 yuan per person and 102.81 yuan per person respectively, and WTA value is 175.06 yuan per person and 129.05 yuan per person respectively. Both WTP and WTA methods can be used to estimate the non-use value of the recreational resource in Huangguoshu resort. However, the WTA is considered more suitable for estimating the nonuse value of the environmental resources in China. This is because that: 1 ) the recreational resources belong to environmental resources, they own the characteristics of the public goods, that is to say, the characteristics of the recreational resources determine their lower economic profits; 2) the benefits of environmental resources are invaluable. Individuals' investments are not enough to support the protection of environmental resources. Instead, the government's investments are greatly needed to protect the environmental resources; 3) living standard in China is at a relatively low level, and consciousness of the people's environmental protection is correspondingly poor. In 2005, there were about 2.25 million tourists visited Huangguoshu Scenical Resort, and its non-use value ranged from 290. 3625 to 393. 885 million Yuan calculated according to WTA method, the ratio of WTA to WTP was analyzed and compared. result shows that the ratio of WTA to WTP is 1.93 and 1.26. The differences between WTA and WTP are caused by endowment effect and loss aversion, income effects and substitutes, ambiguity and uncertainty, and punishment. By monetary valuation of tourism resources, this study would promote consciousness of environmental protection in China and lay a solid theoretic foundation for governments' decision making and policy formulation.
出处 《资源科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第3期431-439,共9页 Resources Science
基金 贵州省级专项基金 贵州省优秀科技人才省长专项资金项目(项目编号:黔省专合字(2006)117号)
关键词 游憩资源 非使用价值 货币估价 WTP值 WTA值 黄果树风景区 Recreational resources Non-use Value Monetary valuation WTP WTA HuangguoshuScenic Resort
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

二级参考文献24

  • 1艾运盛,高岚,邱俊齐.武夷山国家风景名胜区游憩效益的评价[J].北京林业大学学报,1996,18(3):89-97. 被引量:42
  • 2薛达元,农村生态环境,1999年,15卷,3期,39页
  • 3Loomis, J. B., Walsh,R. G. Recreation Economic Decisions, Comparing Benefits and Costs (second edition) [M ]. Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing, Inc, 1997, 159-176
  • 4Hanemann,W. M., Kanninen,B. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data[R]. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley. Working Paper No. 798, 1996, 1-96
  • 5Davis,R. K. Recreation planning as an economic problem[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1963, 3: 239-249
  • 6Mitchell,D. C., Carson,R. T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method[M]. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1989, 85-102
  • 7Carson,R. T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation[J]. Ecological Eco nomics, 1998, 24:15-29
  • 8Day,B., Mourato,S. Willingness to pay for water quality improvements in Chinese rivers: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in the Beijing Area[R]. In: United Nations CSERGE Working Paper 98-01, Center for Social and Economic Research on the Globa
  • 9Swanson,T., Day,B. Valuing water quality in China: purpose, approach and policy[J]. Journal of Environment Sciences, 1999, 11(3): 309-316
  • 10张志强 徐中民 程国栋.条件价值评估法及其研究进展[J].生态学报,.

共引文献358

同被引文献700

引证文献47

二级引证文献494

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部