期刊文献+

气云爆炸对厂区平面布局的影响分析 被引量:3

Gas Explosion's Influence on Plant Layout
下载PDF
导出
摘要 将气云爆炸对厂区平面布局的影响分析分为可燃气云范围确定、爆炸能量确定以及单元间距离确定33个研究步骤,综合考虑系统的易操作性和准确性,分别给出了各步骤恰当的操作方法,即以合适的扩散经验模型作为可燃气云范围确定的方法;以TNO多能法作为气云爆炸能量确定的方法;以冲击波对人员及设备的伤害等级为性能化目标作为单元间距离确定的依据。以南京某甲醇裂解制氢厂家为例,选择ALOHA作为扩散计算工具,按照流程对厂区的气云爆炸后果进行了分析,指出了现有平面布局的不足之处,并以之为依据给出了新的平面布局设计图,说明了系统的可行性。 Gas explosion's influence analyzing on plant layout was divided into three steps, which were flammable gas scope confirmation, explosion energy confirmation and distance confirmation for different units. Considering both the maneuverability and creditability of the system, appropriate methods were proposed for the three steps: suitable empirical gas dispersion models for flammable gas scope confirmation: TNO multi-energy model for explosion energy confirmation; shock wave's different harm classes on people and facility were chosen as performance-Based targets for distance confirmation between different units. With ALOHA as the gas dispersion computation tool, a plaint layout design drawing of a methanol decomposing hydrogen factory in Nanjing was taken as an example to demonstrate the flow. from which the disadvantages of the design drawing are brought forward, and a new plant layout design drawing is put forward, and the feasibility of the flow is thereby validated.
出处 《石油化工高等学校学报》 EI CAS 2008年第1期60-65,共6页 Journal of Petrochemical Universities
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划(2006BAK01B03-3)
关键词 平面布局 气云爆炸 多能法 性能化目标 Plant layout Gas explosion Multi-energy method Performance-based targct
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Khao F I, Abbasi S A. Maior accidents in process industries and an analysis of causes and ronsequences[J]. Loss prevention in the process industries, 1999,12(5):361-378.
  • 2王志荣,蒋军成,王三明.基于客户机/服务器的化工过程灾害模拟评价系统[J].石油化工高等学校学报,2004,17(1):75-79. 被引量:9
  • 3van Wingerden C J M, Opschoor G, Pasman H J. Parameter study into blast generated by vapor cloud explosion[C]//In: Safety and loss prevention in the chemical and oil processing industries. London: Hemisphere, 1989.
  • 4Cleaver R P, Hunpherys C E, Morgan J D, et al. Development of a model to predict the effects of explosions in compact congested regions[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 1997,53(1-3):35-55.
  • 5Merex W P M, van den Berg A C, Hayhurst C J, et al. Developments in vapour cloud explosion blast modeling[J]. Journal of hazardous materials, 2000,71(1-3):301-319.
  • 6van den Berg A C, Versloot N H A. The multi-energy critical separation distance[J]. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2003,16(2):111-120.
  • 7Fthenakis Vasilis M. HGSYSTEM: a review, critique, and comparison with other models[J]. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 1999,12(6):525-531.
  • 8Lobato J, Canzares P, Rodrigo M A, et al. A comparison of hydrogen cloud explosion models and the study of the vulnerability of the damage caused by an aexplosion of H2[J]. International journal of hydrogen energy, 2006,31(12):1780-1790.

二级参考文献7

共引文献8

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部