期刊文献+

喉罩通气在甲状腺切除手术中对应激反应和通气的影响 被引量:33

Effects of laryngeal mask airway ventilation on ventilation and stress during thyroidectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察甲状腺切除手术中运用喉罩通气对血流动力学、应激和通气功能的影响。方法择期行甲状腺切除术患者50例,年龄35~65岁,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,随机均分为气管导管组(T组)和喉罩组(L组)。记录患者入室安静5min时(T0)、插管前即刻(T1)、插管后即刻(T2)、插管后3min(T3)、拔管时(T4)和拔管后3min(T5)的MAP和HR,并于上述时间点采静脉血检测肾上腺素(E)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)水平。记录间歇通气10min(T6)、30min(T7)和60min(T8)时的分钟通气量(MV)、气道峰压(Ppeak)、潮气量(VT)和PETCO2。结果两组T6~T8时MV、VT、SpO2的差异无统计学意义。L组T8时的Ppeak和PETCO2高于T组(P<0·05),L组T2~T5时的MAP较T组降低,HR减慢(P<0·05)。T组T3~T5时的E、NE水平高于L组。T组T5时的E、NE水平高于T0(P<0·05),而L组的E、NE水平在T5与T0时比较差异无统计学意义。结论喉罩通气麻醉操作简便,通气可靠,对心血管系统刺激性小。 Objective To investigate the effects of using laryngeal mask airway(LMA) for mechanical ventilation on stress and ventilation in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Methods Fifty ASA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients aged 35-65 years undergoing thyroidectomy were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to receive either LMA ventilation (group L) or endotracheal intubation (group T) . Anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg , propofol 2 mg/ kg , fentanyl 3 μg/kg and norcuronium 0.10 mg/kg. HR and MAP were measured at 5 min after entering the operation-room (T0) ,before LMA insertion or intubation (T1) ,immediately after that ( T2 ) ,3 min after LMA insertion or intubation (T3) ,immediately after LMA withdrawal or extnbation (T4) and 3 min after LMA withdrawal or extubation(T5 ) . Blood specimens were taken at T0-T5 for determine of plasma concentration of epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) . Peak inspiratory airway pressure (Ppeak) ,minute volume (MV) ,tidal volume (VT) ,SpO2, and PETCO2 were recorded at 10 min of intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) (T6) ,30 min (T7) and 60 min (T8). Results There was no significant difference in Ppeak, MV , VT, SpO2 at 10 min of IPPV ,30 min and 60 min between the two groups. Ppeak and PETCO2 in group L were higher than those in group T at 60 min of IPPV (P〈0.05). The changes in MAP and HR in group L at T2 ,T3 ,T4and T5 were less than those in group T (P〈0. 05) . The concentrations of E and NE in group T at T3 ,T4and T5 were higher than those in group L and the concentrations of E and NE in T group at T5 were still higher than those at To (P〈0.05) . Conclusion LMA ventilation is efficacious for mechanical ventilation with simpler operation and less cardiovascular adverse response than endotracheal intubation.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2008年第3期220-222,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 喉罩 甲状腺切除术 应激反应 通气 Laryngeal mask Thyroidectomy Stress Ventilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1周仁龙,杭燕南.第三代喉罩的临床应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(11):880-882. 被引量:162
  • 2Garcia-A guado R, Vinoles J, Asensio J, et al. Failed gastric tube insertion in the LMA-ProSeal. Acta Anaesthesiol Stand , 2005 ,49:882.
  • 3Maltby JR, Beriault MT, Watson NC, et al. LMA-Classie and LMA-ProSeal are effeetive alternatives to endotraeheal intubation for gyneeologie laparoseopy. Can J Anaesth, 2003,50 : 71- 77.
  • 4Choyce A, Avidan MS, Harvey A, et al. The cardiovascular response to insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia, 2002,57:330-333.
  • 5Keller C,Brimaeomble JR,Keller K, et al. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryn geal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth , 1999,82:286-287.
  • 6Brimacombe J,Berry A. Laryngeal mask airway cuff pressure and position during anaesthesia lasting one to two hours, Can J Anaestha, 1993,41 : 589-593.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Brimacombe JR.Laryngeal mask anesthesia:principles and practice.2nd edn.Philadelphia:Sauders,2005.505-537.
  • 2Verghese C,Brimacombe JR.Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients:safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage.Anesth Analg,1996,82:129-133.
  • 3Roth H,Genzwuerker HV,Rothhaas A,et al.The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the laryngeal tube suction for ventilation in gynaecological patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.Eur J Anaesthesiology,2005,22:117-122.
  • 4Mark DA.Protection from aspiration with the LMA-ProSeal after vomiting:a case report.Can J Anaesth,2003,50:78-80.
  • 5Brimacombe J,Richardson C,Keller C,et al.Mechanical closure of the vocal cords with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.Br J Anaesth,2002,88:296-297.
  • 6Evans NR,Gardner SV,James MF,et al.The ProSeal laryngeal mask:results of a descriptive trail with experience of 300 cases.Br J Anaesth,2002,88:534-539.
  • 7Kodaka M,Okamoto Y,Koyama K,et al.Predicted values of propofol ECs0 and sevoflurane concentration for insertion of laryngeal mask Classic and ProSeal.Br J Anaesth,2004,92:242-245.
  • 8Cook TM,Lee G,Nolan JP.The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway:a review of the literature.Can J Anaesth,2005,52:739-760.
  • 9Brimacombe J,Clarke G,Keller C.Lingual nerve injury associated with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway:a case report and review of the literature.Br J Anaesth,2005,95:420-423.
  • 10Lopez-Gil M,Brimacombe J,Garcia G.A randomized non-crossover study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized children.Br J Anaesth,2005,95:827-830.

共引文献161

同被引文献174

引证文献33

二级引证文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部