期刊文献+

护理专业自我概念量表的信度和效度检测 被引量:92

The Reliability and Validity of Self-Concept of Nurses Instrument Used in the Baccalaureate Nursing Students
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价护理专业自我概念量表在护理本科生中应用的信度和效度。方法应用护理专业自我概念量表对广州4所高校大学二至四年级的全日制四年制护理本科生共833人进行调查。结果护理专业自我概念量表的分半信度为0.86,各领域的分半信度均大于0.60;量表内部一致性信度为0.84,除沟通交流领域外,各领域的内部一致性信度均大于0.60;量表每个条目与其所属领域总分的相关系数均>0.50,提取5个公因子,可以解释总变异的54.06%。结论护理专业自我概念量表有较好的信度和内容效度,结构效度欠佳,可用于评价护理本科生的专业自我概念,但仍需进一步完善。 Objective To evaluate the validity and reliability of Professional Self-Concept of Nurses Instrument (PSCNI) among nursing undergraduates. Methods From Dec. 2006 to Jan. 2007, 833 nursing undergraduates from 4 universities in Guangzhou were investigated by using PSCNI. Pearson correlation analysis, reliability analysis and explorative factor analysis were used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results PSCNI had good split-half reliability (0.86). All the split-half reliability of dimensions were above 0.60. The internal consistency was 0.84, and for all the dimensions were above 0.60, except for the communication (0.32). Each coefficient between an item and its dimension of the instrument was above 0. 50. Five principal components were extracted and the accumulative deviation was 54.06%. Conclusion PSCNI had good reliability and content validity, yet the constructive validity was not satisfactory. It can be used for the evaluation of the professional self-concept among nursing undergraduates though further improvement is needed.
出处 《护理学杂志》 2008年第6期4-6,共3页
关键词 护理本科生 专业自我概念 护理专业自我概念量表 信度 效度 nursing undergraduates professional self-oncept Professional Self-Concept of Nurses Instrument reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献17

  • 1吴雅文,姜安丽,李树贞.护理学情感教学评价工具的研究[J].中国高等医学教育,2000(1):58-60. 被引量:156
  • 2汪向东 王希林 等.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.235.
  • 3陈琦 刘儒德.当代教育心理学(第2版)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1998.167.
  • 4Szostak D, Robertson J F. Issues in measuring critical thinking: meeting the challenge[J]. J Nurs Educ,1996, 35(1):5.
  • 5Barbara K, Rubenfeld G. A consensus statement on critical thinking in nursing[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2000, 39(8):352.
  • 6Maeona K. Concept clarification and critical thinking:integrated processes[J]. J Nurs Educ, 1993,32 (9):407.
  • 7Facione N, Facione P, Sanchez C. Critical thinking disposition as a measure of competent clinical judgment: the development of the California critical thinking disposition inventory[J]. J Nurs Educ,1994, 33(8) :345.
  • 8Adams M H, Whitlow J. Critical thinking as an educational outcome, an evaluation of current tools of measurement[J]. Nurse Educator, 1996, 21(3) :23.
  • 9Rossignol M. Relationship between selected discourse strategies and student critical thinking [ J]. J Nurs Educ,1997, 36(10) :467.
  • 10Pepa C, Brown J, Alverson E. A comparison of critical thinking abilities between accelerated and traditional baccalaureate nursing students [J ]. J Nurs Educ, 1997, 33(1): 46.

共引文献187

同被引文献808

引证文献92

二级引证文献523

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部