期刊文献+

企业知识状态的刚性特征及其克服的微观机制分析 被引量:5

Analysis on the Rigidity of Enterprise's Knowledge State and the Overcoming Micro-Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对企业技术核心能力刚性,从企业知识的角度探讨了技术核心能力形成的过程,提出了知识状态刚性的定义,具体分析了知识状态刚性的形成因素和过程,通过引入动态能力理论,分析动态能力与知识状态的作用关系,得出了运用动态能力理论能够有效地克服知识状态刚性的形成,是克服知识状态刚性的根本途径,在此基础上,分析了知识状态刚性克服的过程和效果,企业在不断吸收和创造新的技术知识循环中,与原有的技术知识整合,形成企业特有的、难以模仿的、适应环境变化的技术知识,最终达到克服技术核心能力的刚性,实现技术核心能力不断动态提升的目的。 The question that how to explain the acquirement of sustainable competitive advantage in dynamic environment through enterprise's knowledge has become the focal point in the field of knowledge management research. Through the study of enterprise's knowledge state, this paper firstly puts forward the definition and meaning of the rigidity of enterprise's knowledge state, taking it as the pivot for enterprise to conquer technological core competence's rigidity and to acquire sustainable competitive advantage. Secondly, the factors and process of the formation of the rigidity of enterprise's knowledge state are analyzed. Thirdly, the authors bring in the dynamic capability theory. According to the analysis of the interaction between dynamic capability and enterprise's knowledge state, the authors find that dynamic capability can effectively overcome the formative factors of the rigidity of enterprise's knowledge state, and it is the essential way to conquer the rigidity of enterprise's knowledge state. Based on this point of view, the authors analyze the process and result of conquering the rigidity of enterprise's knowledge state lastly.
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 2008年第3期124-127,共4页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70572061)
关键词 知识状态 刚性 动态能力 knowledge state rigidity dynamic capability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献31

  • 1魏江.企业核心能力的内涵与本质[J].管理工程学报,1999,13(1):59-61. 被引量:128
  • 2王江,金占明.隐含经验类知识:企业持续竞争优势的源泉[J].南开管理评论,2004,7(5):91-95. 被引量:14
  • 3王明华,王长征.市场知识能力与企业竞争优势[J].中国软科学,2004(10):88-91. 被引量:12
  • 4青木昌彦.比较制度分析.上海:远东出版社,2001
  • 5[4]普拉哈拉德,哈默尔.竞争大未来[M].王振西译.北京:昆仑出版社,1998.40-46.
  • 6[1]Leonard-Barton, Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development[J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992, (13).
  • 7[2]C. K. Prahalad and G. Hamel,The Core Competence of the Corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990, (06).
  • 8[3]C. K. Prahalad and Bettis, The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage Between Diversity and Performance[J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1986, (07).
  • 9[4]D. J. Teece, G. Pisano and Shuen. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management [J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997,(07).
  • 10盖瑞·米勒.《管理困境-科层的政治经济学》[M].上海人民出版社,2002年版..

共引文献138

同被引文献58

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部