期刊文献+

中德两国标准中的“数学能力”比较研究 被引量:10

Comparison of Mathematical Competence in the Mathematics Education between Chinese and German Standards
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国的数学课程注重知识体系,也加强了数学能力发展;而德国教育特别重视数学能力,其数学教育标准以能力为主线,知识为载体.德国的数学教育标准是以能力为导向,而我国的课程标准以知识为导向.我国的能力标准抽象,德国的能力标准比较具体,便于操作.在课程标准的制订过程中,应做到:知识能力,齐头并进;、化形为体,注重系统;划分层次,合理评价. It was important for Chinese mathematical curriculum to develop a knowledge system, also the development of mathematical competence was strengthened; However, German education thought much of mathematical competence specially, and gave priority to the competence on mathematics education. Though two standards both emphasize mathematical competence, lots of their competences were similar; there were some differences on the component and criterion. Chinese competences were abstract to understand, German standard was visual. Thus, Chinese mathematical curriculum standard should paid more attention to the competences' developing and embodiments, which would be helpful to assess students well.
出处 《数学教育学报》 北大核心 2008年第2期74-77,共4页 Journal of Mathematics Education
基金 “上海市浦江人才计划”资助项目——国际视野下的学生数学素养研究(沪2005105)
关键词 知识 数学教育 数学能力 比较 水平 knowledge mathematics education mathematical comoetence comoarison level
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1OECD. Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy [W]. A Framework for PISA2006, http://www. pisa. oecd. org/pages/.
  • 2Weinert F E. Leistungsmessung in Schulen [M]. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz, 2003.
  • 3布鲁纳.教育过程[M].北京:文化教育出版社,1982..

共引文献137

同被引文献52

引证文献10

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部