期刊文献+

固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取蜘蛛香挥发油成分的比较 被引量:27

Solid-phase Microextraction vs.Wet Distillation in the Extraction of Volatile Oil in Jatamans Valeriana Rhizome
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较固相微萃取法与水蒸气蒸馏法提取蜘蛛香挥发油成分的差异。方法:采用气相色谱-质谱联用技术分别对水蒸气蒸馏法和固相微萃取法提取蜘蛛香根茎所得挥发油的化学成分进行比较分析。结果:2种提取方法所得挥发油成分差异较大。与水蒸气蒸馏法比较,固相微萃取法所得挥发油成分数目和种类较多。结论:固相微萃取法比水蒸气蒸馏法具有明显的优越性。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the solid-phase microextraction versus Steam distillation in the extraction of volatile oil in Jatamans Valeriana Rhizome. METHODS: The chemical volatile oil constituents in Jatamans Valeriana Rhizome extracted by solid- phase microextraction versus Steam distillation were analyzed by GS-MS. RESULTS: The extracts by two extraction methods were different significantly. As compared with wet distillation, both the number and varieties of the constituents in the volatile oil extracted by solid- phase microextraction were more. CONCLUSION: Solid-phase microextraction is obviously superior to wet distillation.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第12期918-920,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 固相微萃取法 水蒸气蒸馏法 蜘蛛香 挥发油 成分 气相色谱-质谱联用技术 Solid - phase microextraction Steam distillation Jatamans Valeriana Rhizome Volatile oil Constituents GC - MS
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献80

共引文献145

同被引文献283

引证文献27

二级引证文献185

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部