期刊文献+

LASIK和LASEK术后角膜神经再生情况的比较 被引量:7

Comparison of corneal nerve regeneration between LASIK and LASEK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的在共焦显微镜观察下比较激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)术后角膜神经再生的变化。方法LASIK16例(32眼),LASEK13例(26眼)。分别于术前、术后3月和术后6月进行中央角膜组织共焦显微镜检查,并测定泪膜破裂时间(BUT)。结果LASIK和LASEK术后上皮基底膜下神经纤维数量的差异有统计学意义。两组中,BUT与角膜神经再生均无明显相关关系。结论LASEK术后角膜神经再生明显快于LASIK术后。 Objective To compare changes in corneal nerve fibers by confocal microscopy after laser - assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK). Methods The study included 32 eyes (16 patients) that had undergone LASIK and 26 eyes (13 patients) that had undergone LASEK. Confocal microscopic data of the central cornea and tear film breakup time (BUT) were examined before surgery and at 3,6 months after LASIK or LASEK treatment. Results The number of subbasal nerve fibers was different in the LASIK and LASEK groups. The tear film breakup time did not correlate with corneal nerve regeneration in the two groups. Conclusions Corneal nerve regeneration was faster in LASEK-operated eyes than in LASIK-operated eyes.
作者 高莎莎 吕勇
出处 《眼外伤职业眼病杂志》 北大核心 2008年第4期285-288,共4页 Journal of Injuries and Occupational Diseases of the Eye with Ophthalmic Surgeries
关键词 激光原位角膜磨镶术 激光上皮瓣下角膜磨镶术 共焦显微镜检查 角膜神经 再生 laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis laser epithelial keratomileusis confocal microscopy corneal nerve regeneration
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1张梅,刘祖国,陈家祺,罗丽辉,孙明霞,陈龙山,黄挺,王智崇.正常人角膜神经的共焦显微镜观察[J].中华眼科杂志,2004,40(9):632-634. 被引量:24
  • 2Slowik C, Somodi S, Richter A, et al. Assessment of coreal alterations following laser in situ keratomileusis by confocal slit scanning microscopy[ J]. Ger J Ophthalmol,1996,5(6) :526-531.
  • 3Lee BH, McLaren JW, Erie JC, et al. Reinnervation in the cornea after LASIK [J ]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2002, 43 ( 12 ) : 3660-3664.
  • 4Erie JC, Nau CB, McLaren JW, etal. Long-term keratocyte deficits in the corneal stroma after LASIK[ J]. Ophthalmology,2004,111 (7) :1356-1361.
  • 5Calvillo MP, McLarenJW, Hodge DO, et al. Corneal reinnervation after LASIK: prospective three-year longitudinal study [ J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ,2004,45 ( 11 ) :3991-3996.
  • 6Fruch BE, Cadez R, Bohnke M. In vivo eanfocal microscopy after photorefractive keratectomy in humans: a prospective, long-term study [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998,116 ( 11 ) : 1425-1431.
  • 7Tervo T, Moilanen J. In vivo confocal microscopy for evaluation of wound healing following corneal refractive surgery [ J ]. Prog Retina Eye Res,2003,22(3) :339-358.
  • 8Taneri S, Zeiske JD, Azar DT. Evolution, techniques, clinical outcomes, and pathophysiology of LASEK : review of the literature [ J ]. Surv Ophthalmol,2003,49(6) :576-602.
  • 9Lee HK, Lee KS, Kim HC, et al. Nerve growth factor concentration and implications in photorefractive keratectomy vs laser in situ keratomileusis[J]. AmJ Ophthalmol,2005,139(6) :965-971.
  • 10Bron AJ. Diagnosis of dry eye. Surv Ophthalmol,2001,45 (2) : S221- 226.

二级参考文献6

  • 1Mustonen RK,McDonald MB,Srivannaboon S,et al.Normal human corneal cell populations evaluated by in vivo scanning slit confocal microscopy.Cornea,1998,17:485-492.
  • 2Cacanagh HD,Petroll WM,Alizadeh H,et al.Clinical and diagnostic use of in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with corneal disease.Ophthalmology,1993,100:1444-1454.
  • 3Oliveira-Soto L,Efron N.Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy.Cornea,2001,20:374-384.
  • 4Grupcheva CN,Wong T,Riley AE,et al.Assessing the sub-basal nerve plexus of the living healthy human cornea by in vivo confocal microscopy.Clin Expriment Ophthalmol,2002,30:187-190.
  • 5立信,史伟云,郭萍,袁风波,李绍伟.正常人活体角膜组织结构的共焦显微镜观察[J].中华眼科杂志,2000,36(3):235-237. 被引量:26
  • 6孙明霞,林跃生,刘永民,陈家祺,张沛云.中国人正常角膜的共焦显微镜检查[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2001,19(3):180-183. 被引量:18

共引文献23

同被引文献69

引证文献7

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部