摘要
目的分析冠脉介入治疗与抗凝治疗不稳定型心绞痛(UA)患者的疗效。方法45例UA患者中,20例接受冠脉介入治疗,23例接受抗凝治疗。结果冠脉介入治疗组显效率、再发心绞痛率均低于抗凝组,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。发生左心衰竭有减少趋势,但差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论冠脉介入治疗与抗凝治疗不稳定型心绞痛患者,前者能更好地改善冠脉血管灌注和心脏功能。
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of PCI and anti-coagulation in patients of unstable angina. Methods Fourty-five patients with UA accepted either PCI（20 patients） or anti-coagulation（23 patients）. Results The rate of apparent efficiency and repeated angina in patients with PCI were lower than that of anti-coagulation. There were significant differences （ P 〈 0. 05 ）. There were decreasing tendency in left heart failure, but no significant differences （ P 〉 0. 05 ）. Conclusion The present study showed that PCI is more effective in improving perfusion of corona arterias and preserving cardiac function.
出处
《淮海医药》
CAS
2008年第3期194-195,共2页
Journal of Huaihai Medicine
