摘要
我国两部刑法典都是客观主义性质的刑法典,1997年对1979年《刑法》的修正只是立法技术的提升,并不意味着刑法基本立场有重大的转变。刑法首先是行为规范,其次才是裁判规范。纯粹的行为无价值论与结果无价值论都无法说明我国刑法的基本性质,只有将两者结合起来考虑才符合我国刑法的基本立场。法益侵害说存在缺陷,应同时考虑规范违反说才能正确解释刑法规范的性质。
Both the former and the existing Criminal Acts in China are characterized by objectivism. Titus, the amendment in 1997 is deemed an improvement of legislative skill rather than a great change of the basic position of the criminal law. A criminal law is more a norm of behavior than a norm of adjudication. Neither by pure handlungsunwert nor by pure erfolgsunwert can we sketch out the features of China＇ s criminal law. Only by combining the two doctrines, can the basic position of Chin＇ s criminal law be determined. Defects can be found in the doctrine of infringement of legal interests. As such, to interpret the norms of criminal law correctly, we should at the same time take into account the doctrine of violation of norms.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期20-29,共10页
Modern Law Science
关键词
刑法
立场
主观主义
客观主义
criminal law
basic position
subjectivism
objectivism
