期刊文献+

心理健康量表2005年修订版:信度研究 被引量:2

Mental health scale-the revised version 2005 :reliability
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的检验心理健康量表2005年修订版(Mental Health Scale—revised version 2005,MHS V2005)的信度。方法抽取山东省六个有代表性的市,共1183名被试作为普通人群样本,男性599人,女性584人,年龄15—88岁,用MHS V2005施测。结果(1)项目间平均相关系数:13个一阶因素、3个二阶因素和全量表的项目间平均相关系数分别0.25~0.43、0.49~0.55和0.48。(2)Cronbaeh’Sα系数:一阶因素、二阶因素和全量表的Cronbaeh’sα系数分别为为0.70~0.89、0.88~0.95和0.91。(3)分半信度:一阶因素、二阶因素和全量表的分半信度分别为0.67~0.88、0.74~0.91和0.86。(4)重测信度分析:一阶因素、二阶因素和全量表的重测信度系数分别为0.64~0.81、0.78~0.99和0.86。结论MHS V2005的信度达到心理测量学要求。 Objective To test the reliability of Mental Health Scale-the revised version 2005 (MHS V2005 ) as a tool for use in the general population. Methods The samples were 599 male and 584 female, aged 15-88 years, who completed a questionnaire regarding Mental Health Scale. Results ( 1 )The mean inter-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.25 - 0.43,0.49 - 0.55,0.48 for the first-order factors, second-order factors and the total scale respectively. ( 2 ) All the Cronbach' sct coefficient were ranged 0.70 - 0.89,0.88 - 0.95 and 0.91 for the first order factors ,second order factors and the total scale respectively. (3)Split-half reliability were ranged from 0.70 - 0.88,0.74 - 0.90,0.79 for the first-order factors, second-order factors and the total scale respectively. (4) The test-retest reliability were range 0.64 to 0.80,0.74 to 0.91 and 0.86 for the first-order,second-order factors and the total scale respectively. Conclusion The reliability and the validity of the MHS V2005 achieved the criterion of psychometrics.
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2008年第5期470-472,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 心理测量 心理健康量表2005年修订版 信度 普通人群 Psychometrics Mental Health Scale-the revised version (MHS V2005 ) Reliability General population
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献66

共引文献308

同被引文献11

  • 1王才康,胡中锋,刘勇.一般自我效能感量表的信度和效度研究[J].应用心理学,2001,7(1):37-40. 被引量:2747
  • 2Zhang JX, Schwarzer R. Mearuring optimistic self-beliefs:A Chinese adaptation of the General Self-eflicacy Scale. Psychologia,1995 ,3 :174-181.
  • 3Amett JJ . Emerging adulthood : A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist,2000,55:469-480.
  • 4Bynner J. Rethinking the youth phase of the life course: The case for emerging adulthood. Journal of Youth Studies ,2005,8:367-384.
  • 5Dennerstein L, Lehert P, Guthrie JR. The effects of the menopausal transition and biopaychosocial factors on well-being. Arch Women' s Mental Health, 2002,5 : 15-22.
  • 6Cara T, Sara A, Nancy M. What drives older women' s perceptions of health-related quality. Quality of Life Research, 2007,16:593-605.
  • 7汪向东 王希林 马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册.中国心理卫生杂志,1999,12:217-217.
  • 8吴文源.症状自评量表[J].中国行为医学科学,2001,10:49-52.
  • 9刘素贞,许明智,朱金富,李恒芬,贾福军.心理健康量表2005年修订版:效度研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2008,17(5):473-474. 被引量:1
  • 10王萍,高华,许家玉,黄金菊,王成江.自尊量表信度效度研究[J].山东精神医学,1998,11(4):31-32. 被引量:68

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部