期刊文献+

肺癌诊断中肿瘤标志物的过度医疗及其措施 被引量:4

REASONABLE UTILIZATION OF TUMOR MARKERS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LUNG CANCERS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肿瘤标志物诊断肺癌的合理组合,以避免过度医疗。方法选择106例肺癌病人和30例肺部良性疾病病人,以电化学发光免疫法测定其血清中6种常用肿瘤标志物——可溶性细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21—1)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇酶(NSE)及糖类抗原153、125、199(CA153、CA125、CA199)的含量为主方法,以经济学领域中卫生服务需求理论分析为副方法,共同为避免过度医疗求证合理数据。结果6种肿瘤标志物在肺癌病人中的含量均明显高于肺部良性疾病组(Z=1.979~5.988,P〈0.05、0.01)。NSE在小细胞肺癌、CEA在腺癌、CYFRA21—1在鳞癌中敏感度最高,分别为79.4%、71.8%、69.7%。结论以NSE、CEA、CY—FRA21—1作为肺癌肿瘤标志物联检的核心组合,再使用经济学的边际效用递减规律来推测联检所需项数的合理范围,可避免过度医疗。 Objective To study reasonable combination of tumor markers in the diagnosis of lung cancer to avoid excessive medical treatment. Methods Six commonly used tumor markers (CYFRA 21-1,CEA,NSE, CA153, CA125, CA199) in 106 patients with lung cancers and 30 patients with benign pulmonary diseases were detected by ECLIA. An analysis of health service demand theory in economics domain as a secondary method. Results Serum levels of the six tumor markers in the cancer patients were significantly higher than that in patients with benign pulmonary diseases (Z= 1. 979- 5. 988;P〈0.05,0.01). The highest sensitivity of NSE was found in small cell lung cancer (79.4%), that of CEA in adenocarcinoma (71.8%) and CYFRA21- 1 in squamous cancer (69.7%). Conclusion Serum levels of NSE, CEA and CYFRA21-1 can serve as tumor markers core combination for diagnosis of lung cancers. "Marginal utility decrease progressively rule" in economics domain can be used to presume the number of associated examination items so as to avoid excessive medical treatment.
出处 《青岛大学医学院学报》 CAS 2008年第2期133-135,138,共4页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Qingdao Universitatis
关键词 肺肿瘤 肿瘤标记 生物学 过度医疗 Lung neoplasms Tumor markers, biological Excessive medical treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献56

共引文献49

同被引文献44

  • 1张昕,张湘茹.肺癌肿瘤标志物的临床价值[J].癌症进展,2005,3(2):159-162. 被引量:42
  • 2崛口高彦,韩少良.肺癌肿瘤标志物[J].日本医学介绍,2005,26(2):65-68. 被引量:8
  • 3张哲民.联合检测血清CYFRA21-1、CA153及NSE在肺癌诊治中的临床意义[J].中国癌症杂志,2005,15(6):566-568. 被引量:10
  • 4杨刚,何安南,曹进平.肺癌血清CEA、CA-125、CA19-9联合检测的诊断价值[J].皖南医学院学报,2007,26(3):181-182. 被引量:9
  • 5Jemal A,Siegel R,Ward E,et al . Cancer statistics,2009 [J] . CA Cancer J Clin, 2009,59 (4) : 225-49.
  • 6Icard P,Regnard JF,Essomba A,et al. Preoperative carcinoembryonie antigen level as a prognostic indicator in resected primary lung cancer [J] .Ann Thorae Surg. 1994. 58(3):811-814.
  • 7Okada M,Sakamoto T,Nishio W,et al. Characteristics and prognosis of patients after resection of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma measuring 2 cm or less in greatest dimension [J] . Cancer,2003,98 (3):535- 541.
  • 8Satoh H,Ishikawa H,Ohtsuka M,Sekizawa K . Cut-off levels of CYFRA21-1 to differentiate between metastatic and non-metastatic NSCLC[J]. Lung Cancer, 2005,48( 1 ) : 151-152.
  • 9Bonnet JA,Sloan JA,Rowland KM Jr,et al. Significance of neuronspecific enolase levels before and during therapy for small cell lung cancer[J]. Clin Cancer Res,2000,6(2) :597-~01.
  • 10Fizazi K,Cojean I,Pignon JP,et al . Normal serum neuron specific enolase (NSE)value after the first cycle of chemotherapy: an early predictor of complete response and survival in patients with small cell lung carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 1998,82(6) : 1049-1055.

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部