摘要
荀子《非十二子》对诸子的批判,是荀、孟在性善恶问题上的分歧,二者在此问题的实质上并没有分歧。《非十二子》和《汉书.艺文志》对诸子分类和批评的不同,乃始于学术批判,根于政治批判。它们的分类不同是源于不同的角度和不同的时代。
This paper analyzes Xun Zi＇s criticism on the Han schools＇ opinions shown in his book ＂Fei Shier Zi＂ （Book of Xun Zi）. Meanwhile it discusses the divergency from good by nature and evil by nature and each conclusion that the two have no fundamental differences after all. By analyzing the classification concerned in Fei Shier Zi and Han Zhu（catalogue of History of Han）, the author considers that Xun Zi＇s criticism began from the academic field, but rooted in the political circle. The classifications of these two books are based on different historical circumstances and from different stands. Therefore, we should not hold a negative attitude towards either of them.
出处
《龙岩学院学报》
2008年第2期23-27,共5页
Journal of Longyan University
关键词
荀子
《非十二子》
《汉书·艺文志》
诸子
Xun Zi
＂Fei Shier Zi （Xun Zi＇s masterpiece）＂
Han Zhu（catalogue of History of Han）
the Han Schools
