期刊文献+

语言、身份与国际秩序:后建构主义理论研究 被引量:24

Language,Identity and International Order:On Postconstructivism
原文传递
导出
摘要 后建构主义以后现代建构主义和后结构主义为理论基础,把语言、身份和国际秩序作为自己的理论核心,强调身份是社会语言建构的结果,需要通过语言来维持和发展,尤其是在某些危机时期,语言会作为一个独立变量影响国际秩序。就如同物质力量决定国际体系结构一样,语言同样造就一种叙述结构,约束行为体的自我认同,影响行为体的行为。在这个过程中,行为体主要是使用语言力(尤其是语言的表象力)来维护原有的叙述结构,把原有的集体身份强加给对方,使自我认同不被破坏。行为体可以通过巧妙的语言表达和链接来加固原有的身份,维护原有的自我认同,使失序的国际关系回复到有序状态。 Postconstructivism,drawing on relevant theories of postmodern constructivism and poststructrualism,takes language,identity and international order as the core of the theory.It holds that identity is a kind of social linguistic construction and should be maintained and developed by language.During crisis or uncertain times,language can be an independent variable for international order.As material power is the basis of international system structure,language can also form a narrative structure,which restrains the actor's sense of Self and choice of action.During this process,the actor mainly uses representational force to maintain the original narrative structure and forces the original collective identity upon his counterparts,who can not afford the destruction of his original sense of Self.The actor can skillfully structure the phrases and linking to fasten the original identity and bring the order back.
作者 孙吉胜
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期26-36,共11页 World Economics and Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leader,eds. , Constructivism and In- ternational Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, New York : Routledge, 2006.
  • 2Maja Zehfuss, Constructivism in International Relations: Wcndt, Onuf and Kratoehwil, in Karin M. Fierkc and Knud Erle Jorgensen, eds. , Constructing International Relations: the Next Generation, NY: M.E. Sharp, 2001.
  • 3Janice Bially Mattem, Ordering of International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force, New York: Routledge, 2005, p. 12.
  • 4Brian McCormack, "Uncovering the Source of International Order," International Studies Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005, p. 500.
  • 5[美]约翰·鲁杰.《什么因素将世界维系在一起?新功利主义与社会建构主义的挑战》,[美]彼得·卡赞斯坦,罗伯特·基欧汉,斯蒂芬·克拉斯纳编,秦业青等译.《世界政治理论的探索与争鸣》,上海:上海人民出版社,2006年版,第255~294页.
  • 6Francois Debfix, "Language, Nonfoundationalism, International Relations," in Francois Debrix, ed. , Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World, Armonk and London: M.E. Sharpe, 2003, p. 12.
  • 7Francois Debrix, "language, Nonfoundationalism, International Relations," in Francois Debrix, ed. , Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed World, pp. 6 -7.
  • 8[新西兰]迈克尔·彼得斯著 王成兵 吴玉军译.《后结构主义/结构主义,后现代主义/现代主义:师承关系及差异》[J].哈尔滨师专学报,2000,(5):3-3.
  • 9Janice BiaUy Mattern, Ordering of lnternational Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force, p. 12.
  • 10Janice Bially Mattern, Ordering of lnternational Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force, p. 12.

二级参考文献27

  • 1亚历山大·温特 秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年..
  • 2肯尼思·沃尔兹 胡少华译.《国际政治理论》[M].中国人民公安大学出版社,1992年.第2页.
  • 3亚历山大·温特.《国际政治的社会理论》,第139—169页.
  • 4玛莎·费丽莫.《国际社会中的国家利益》,第3页.
  • 5Yosef Lapid,"The Third Debate:On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era",International Studies Quarterly, Sept. 1989
  • 6Ole Wever, "The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate", in Steve Smith eds. , International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 7Brian Frederking,Resolving Security Dilemma : A Constructivist Explanation of the INF Treaty, Ashgate Pubhshing Ltd,2000, p. 2.
  • 8Robert Jervis, "Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma", World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 2,1978 ,pp. 167 -214.
  • 9John J. Mearsheimer, "The False Promise of International Institutions" ,International Security, Winter, 1994/1995, p. 11
  • 10Paul Schroeder, "Historical Reality vs Neo-realism Theory", International Security,Summer, 1994, p. 109.

共引文献66

同被引文献437

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部