摘要
柏拉图《理想国》卷十中的两个问题(对诗的第二次批评和用神话来做结尾)长久以来一直是研究者们聚讼纷纭的对象,由于不能正确理解这两个问题,人们往往认为卷十和全书、卷十自身都缺乏连贯一致性。本文意在推翻这种理解,通过分析《理想国》全书的问题结构及情节论证的发展线索,指明了卷十的位置及前述两个论题出现的必然性,最终有力地捍卫了《理想国》全书及卷十的整体性,并以卷十所涉及到的哲学与诗既冲突又合谐的双重关系为依托,揭示了卷十的结构特性。
Many Plato scholars have always insisted on the inconsistency of Republic and the tenth book of it, because they find it is difficult to understand why Socrates would criticize poetry for the second time in the tenth book and would end the whole book with a myth （the myth of Er）. This paper aims to dismantle the argument of inconsistency and to show the necessity of the emergency of the two themes in question through an analysis of how the argument is built and how the plot is developed in Republic. In doing so, this paper ultimately defends the consistency of Republic and the tenth book in a relentless way, disclosing what is so characteristic of the structure of the latter, with a comprehension of the dual relation of conflict and concord between poetry and philosophy.
出处
《现代哲学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期80-86,共7页
Modern Philosophy
