期刊文献+

试论管理哲学在我国的研究与发展 被引量:2

Discussion on the Research and Development of Management Philosophy in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 哲学是一门非常古老的学问,而管理哲学却是一门年轻的学科。管理哲学是管理学界和哲学界共同关注的一个研究领域。管理实践的发展需要管理哲学的产生,管理哲学是管理理论发展的必然结果,兼有管理学和哲学的双重内涵。利用文献计量方法梳理管理哲学研究发展的现状与趋势,借鉴科学学的研究方法探索管理哲学的发展与成熟的基础,形成相对统一的管理哲学分类,促进其良性发展。 Although philosophy is one of the oldest subjects, management philosophy is a relative new subject, and also a brand-new field waiting to investigated into. Management philosophy is a research focus hotly discussed by the field experts of management and philosophy. The development of management practice depends on management philosophy. Management philosophy is the inevitable outcome of the management theory development. It has the double meanings of management and philosophy. By applying bibliometrics methods, we make a research on present situation and development tendency of management philosophy. With the method of studies in science of science,we also explore its foundation of development and maturity. Unified subject classification of management philosophy will promote its development in China.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第6期9-14,共6页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70371027)
关键词 管理哲学 科学管理 中国管理哲学 管理理论 学科分类 management philosophy scientific management Chinese management philosophy management theory subject classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献13

  • 1A. L. Lytle, J. M. Brett, Z. I. Barsness, C. H.Tinsely, M. Janssens. A Paradigm for Confirmatory Cross-cultural Research in Organizational Behavior.Research in Organizational Behavior, 1995. (17) : 167 -214.
  • 2C. Brewster, O. Tregaskis, A. Hegewich, L. Mayne.Comparative Research in Human Resource Management: A Review and Example[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,1996, (3): 585-604.
  • 3P. C. Earley. Face, Harmony, and Social Structure:An Analysis of Organizational Behavior across Culture[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
  • 4P.C. Earley. East Meets West Meets Midwest:Further Explorations of Collectivistic and Individualistic Work Groups [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1993, (2): 319-348.
  • 5G. Hofstede. Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1980.
  • 6F. Kluehhohn, F. Strodtbeek. Variations in Value Orientation [M]. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press,1961. 395.
  • 7R. J. Marshak. Lewin Meets Confucious : A Review of the OD Model of Change [J]. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1994, (4): 393-415.
  • 8M. L. Maznevski, J. J. DiStefano. Global Leaders Are Team Players: Developing Global Leaders through Membership on Global Team [J]. Human Resource Management, 2000, (39):195- 208.
  • 9M. Rokeaeh. The Nature of Human Values [M]. New York: Free Press, 1973.
  • 10R. P. Rohner. Toward a Connection of Culture for Cross-Cultural Psychology [J]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1984, (2):111 - 138.

共引文献66

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部