期刊文献+

哮喘门诊专职护士健康教育效果评价与分析 被引量:3

The evaluation and analyses of the effect of health education provided by professional outpatient asthma nurses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:了解哮喘患者接受健康教育及目前哮喘控制情况。方法:研究对象为2006年1月至2007年12月在我院呼吸内科哮喘门诊就诊的哮喘患者365例,通过哮喘控制测试问卷(ACT)、自行设计的调查问卷和简易肺功能测定收集资料。结果:365例患者中,146例(40%)ACT评分<20分,为没有控制;179例(49%)评分在20~24分,为控制良好;40例(11%)总分达到满分25分,为完全控制。达到良好控制以上的患者共有219例,占60%。159例患者行肺功能检测,结果与健康教育前比较,P<0.001。结论:接受健康教育的哮喘患者其哮喘控制水平良好,部分患者肺功能检测结果较健康教育前有明显改善(P<0.001)。 Objective:To identify the health education conditions of patients at the asthma clinic and their current asthma control level.Method:The samples of this study were 365 asthma patients at the asthma clinic of respiratory department in Chao Yang Hospital from January 2006 to December 2007.The data were collected through the asthma control test(ACT),the self-designed questionnaires and the patients'lung function test.Results:The scores of ACT among 365 patients were as follows:146 cases (40%)being uncontrolled with the score of below 20 points,while 179(49%) demonstrating we4ll-controlled status with the score of 20-24 points.The remaining 40 patients(11%) showed completely controlled with the score of 25 points.Totally,219 patients,accounting for 60%,achived well control and complete control.The lung function of 159 patients was significantly improved compared to their situation before health education(P〈0.001).Conclusion:After health education,the asthma patients are controlled well.The lung function of some patients was significantly improved compared to their situation before health education(P〈0.001).
出处 《中国护理管理》 2008年第6期39-41,共3页 Chinese Nursing Management
关键词 哮喘 哮喘控制测试(ACT) 肺功能 问卷调查 asthma,asthma control test,lung function,questionnaire investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献36

  • 1鲍永霞,吕福祯,邵玉霞,孙冰,郑惠.轻中度哮喘患者与健康人的运动耐量对比研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2003,18(2):82-84. 被引量:6
  • 2母双,何权瀛.支气管哮喘患者系统教育和管理效果评估[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2005,4(2):86-91. 被引量:28
  • 3许仁勇.指导患者正确使用定量型气雾剂之必要性和可行性[J].上海医学,1996,19(12):718-719. 被引量:4
  • 4Williams SG, Schmidt DK, Redd SC,et al. Key clinical activities for quality asthma care. Recommendations of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep,2003,52:1-8.
  • 5Gallefoss F, Bakke PS. Impact of patient education and selfmanagement on morbidity in asthmatics and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Respir Med, 2000,94:279-287.
  • 6Durna Z, Ozcan S.Evaluation of self-management education for asthmatic patients[J]. J Asthma,2003,40(6):631-643.
  • 7LeRoy M. Graham. Classifying asthma [ J ]. Chest, 2006,130,13s- 20s.
  • 8Global Initiative for Asthma. GINA workshop report, global strategy for asthma management and prevention( revised 2006) [ S]. Available at : www. ginasthma, org.
  • 9Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, et al. Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma Control Study[J]. Am J Respir Cfit Care Med,2004,170(8) :836- 844.
  • 10Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, et al. Development of the asthma control test : a survey for assessing asthma control [ J ]. J Allergy Clin lmmuno1,2004 ,113 ( 1 ) :59 - 65.

共引文献79

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部