期刊文献+

北京市某三级甲等综合性教学医院医疗质量评价--住院死亡率 被引量:4

Evaluating medical care quality for a teaching hospital in Beijing:inhospital mortality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨使用住院死亡类指标评价北京市某三级甲等综合性教学医院医疗质量。方法基准比较,包括以年度为基准的医院自身纵向比较和以领先者为基准的医院间横向比较。结果该医院住院患者总死亡率,特别是手术患者住院死亡率呈逐年下降趋势;围手术期死亡率与重返手术室患者住院死亡率呈波动状态。在5所同地区、同类、同级别医院中,该医院2006年手术患者住院死亡率和重返手术室患者住院死亡率处于第二位;住院患者总死亡率处于第三位,围手术期死亡率处于第四位。结论该医院医疗质量相对稳定并有所改善,但在5所同地区、同类、同级别的医院中尚未达到领先水平。 Objective Evaluating medical care quality of a teaching hospital in Beijing with the main clinical indicators of inhospital mortality. Method Benchmaring, including the indicators comparison vertically (using the hospital's data from the year 2004 to 2006) and the indicators comparison horizontally (using the five teaching hospital's data of the year 2006) . Results Both total inpatient mortality and total mortality for surgical procedures of the teaching hospital have been improved continually from the year 2004 to 2006.The perioperative mortality and the inpatient mortality for the patients who returned to the operating room were fluctuatie. With the data of other four teaching hospitals 2006, both total mortality for surgical procedures and the inpatient mortality for the patients who returned to the operating room of the teaching hospital were in the second position: the total inpatient mortality of the teaching hospital was in the third position: the perioperative mortality of the hospital was in the fourth position. Conclusion The medical care quality of the teaching hospital remains stable, but has not reached the level of the advanced hospitals.
出处 《中国医院管理》 北大核心 2008年第6期22-24,共3页 Chinese Hospital Management
关键词 医疗质量评价 住院死亡率 基准比较 evaluaing medical care quality, inhospital mortality, benchmaring
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献11

  • 1刘卫东,徐剑铖,黄春基.医院临床学科评估指标体系的构建与应用[J].中国医院管理,2005,25(3):19-20. 被引量:25
  • 2刘景广.基于战略的医院业绩绩效评价指标设计[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(5):24-25. 被引量:12
  • 3张丹阳,张仲,樊立华.黑龙江省三级综合医院绩效评价指标体系研究[J].中国医院管理,2007,27(5):26-28. 被引量:33
  • 4中华人民共和国卫生部.医院管理评价指南(试行)[Z].2005-03-?
  • 5Brennan T A, Leape L L, Laird N M, et al. Incident of adverse events and negligence in-hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 370- 376.
  • 6Leape L L, Brennan T A, Laird N M, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard medical Practice Study I[J]. N Engl J Med, 1991, 324: 377-384.
  • 7Wilson R M, Runciman W B, Gibberd R W, et al. The Quality in Australian Health Care Study [J]. Medical Journal of Australia, 1995, 163(1): 458-471.
  • 8Cantrill J A, Sibbald B, Buetow S. Indicators of the appropriateness of long term prescribing in general praetiee in the United Kingdom: Consensus development, face and eontent validity, feasibility and reliability[J]. Quality in Health Care, 1998(7): 130-135.
  • 9Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed [J]. JAMA, 1988, 260: 1743-1748.
  • 10Donabedian A. Quality assurance in health care: a consumer's role [J]. Quality of Health Care, 1992, (1): 247-251.

共引文献76

同被引文献14

引证文献4

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部