期刊文献+

自决权内外划分学说的负面效应及其防范 被引量:2

The Negative Effects of the Theory on Internal and External Rights of Self-determination and Its Prevention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方学者的"自决权内外划分学说"主张将自决权划分为"内部自决权"和"外部自决权",这有其积极的一面,但更多的是其消极的一面。它不仅使使自决权及相关概念变得更加混乱,而且容易导致干涉他国内政的合法化;它不仅不能挽救反而会断送自决权原则的命运。为此,笔者主张用"学科划分法"代替"内外划分法"。 The theory on internal and external rights of self-determination of Western scholars advocates that self-determination rights should be divided into internal self-determination rights and external self-determination rights. It has positive aspects but more negative. It not only make self-determination right and its related concepts more confused, but also causes the legalization of the behaviors of interfering in other countries' internal affairs. It can't save but kill the destiny of the self- determination right principle. Therefore, the author advocates that the internal and external researching method should be replaced by the researching method in subject.
作者 王英津
出处 《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2008年第4期10-15,共6页 Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目"自决理论研究"(04CZZ012)
关键词 自决 自决权 内部自决权 外部自决权 self-determination rights of self-determination rights of internal self-determination rights of external self- determination
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Antonio Cassese, Self-determination of Peoples, A Legal Reappraisal, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • 2Allan Rosas, Internal Self-Determination, in Modern Law of Self-Determination, edited by Christian Tomuschat, 1993.
  • 3S. Janes Anaya, A Contemporary Definition of the International Norm of Self-Determination, 3 Transnational Law and Contemporay Problems. 1993.
  • 4Morton H. Halperin, David J. Schefher eds., Self-Determination in the New World Order, 1992.
  • 5Nihal Jayawickrama, The Right of Self-Determination: A Time for Reinvention and Renewal, 57 Suskachewan Law Review, 1993.

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部