摘要
苏辛虽号为一派,实际上审美趣向迥然不同。不同的人生历练、思想性格、历史背景造就了两位巨擘不同的美学境界,一个豪迈洒脱,一个苍凉悲壮。苏轼的豪放更多以自我为中心,在儒道释的轮回中游移。辛弃疾具有传统的儒家入世救世的忠君爱国思想,因而他的词作更具强烈的感召力和震撼力;苏轼在封闭的自我欣赏的状态中抒写心灵,作品呈"有我之境"。辛弃疾词作精神意境单纯如一,达"无我之境";从形式看,苏词的豪放在于题材的开拓性耕耘,表现手法的诗歌化运用,给后人智慧的启迪。辛弃疾进行了更为深入的挖掘和吸收,独特经历和国家存亡的危险时局,使他的情感更真切,取得的艺术成就更大些。
Though Su Shi and Xin Qiji are both regarded as bold poets, yet they show different aesthetic sentiments. As they possessed different life experiences, different ideas ＆ personalities, and different historical backgrounds, these two great scholars reached different aesthetic levels. One is heroic and unrestrained, while the other desolate and soul -stirring. His bold style of writing is serf- centered and he wavers between Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism. Xin Qiji possessed the traditional patriotic and loyal idea, which is Cortfucianism＇ s idea of entering society and saving it. Therefore, his works are more appealing and soul - stirring. Su Shi wrote his works in a closed manner of serf - appreciation, so his works assume a serf - centered state. Xin Qi- ji＇ s works are pure and consistent in spirit, which focuses on one＇ s devotion to one＇ s motherland. And the form of his works can inspire and enlighten the future generation because of the pioneering theme and poetic technique of expression. On the basis of Su Shi, Xin Qiji exploited and absorbed more. As he had unique fighting experiences and experienced the dangerous political situa- tion of break - or - make, his sentiments were more genuine and clearer and his emotions more sincere. That was why he scored greater artistic achievements.
出处
《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第4期65-71,共7页
Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
苏轼
辛弃疾
审美异趣
豪放
Su Shi, Xin Qiji, different aesthetic delights, different bold styles of writing
