期刊文献+

基于认知诊断的被试类比推理测验行为分析 被引量:1

A Research on Examinees' Analogous Reasoning Test Performance Based on Cognitive Diagnosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在构建被试解题路径模型的基础上,应用多策略多成分潜在特质模型研究被试类比推理测验的行为,精细地分析了被试在类比推理过程中所使用的策略、分析了影响被试类比推理测验策略选择的因素、估计了被试在类比推理测验中所表现的各种能力。 This research applied the multiple-strategies-multiple-components-latent-trait model to studying the subjects ' performance in the analogy test, including analyzing accurately strategies used by the subjects in dealing with the analogy test, and factors affecting the subjects in selecting a certain strategy, estimating the subjects ' competence shown in completing the analogy test.
机构地区 江西师范大学
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期971-973,955,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 全国高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(课题号20050414001)系列研究之一
关键词 类比推理 多策略多成分潜在特质模型 认知诊断 analogous reasoning, MLTM for MS, cognitive diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Gick M. L, Holyoak K. J, Analogical problem - solving Cognitive Psychology 1983 12 (3): 306-355.
  • 2Susan E. Embretson. Multicomponeaat Lateaat Trait Models for ability tests. Psychornetrika, 1980,45,479 - 494.
  • 3Steinberg. R.J. Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 1977,84(4) : 353 - 378.
  • 4Klaas Sijtsma, Anton C. Verweij. Knowledge of solution strategies and IRT modeling of items for transitive reasoning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1997,22(1 ) : 55 - 68.
  • 5康春花,戴海崎.采用LLTM作测量与认知结合研究的初步探讨[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):569-572. 被引量:17

二级参考文献5

  • 1周详,曾晖.现代认知心理学关于空间能力和心理旋转的研究[J].心理科学,1995,18(6):363-365. 被引量:16
  • 2Susan E. Embretson. Multicomponent Latent Trait Models for Test Design. TEST DESIGN. 196-217
  • 3Susan E. Embretson. Psychometric Models for Learning and Cognitive Processes. Test Theory for a New Generation of Tests 126 - 150
  • 4张厚粲 龚文.当前心理测量学的发展与现状[J].心理学探新,1995,(1).
  • 5杨孟萍 石德澄.空间认知能力的测验研究(摘录)[J].心理学,.

共引文献16

同被引文献28

  • 1毕鸿燕,彭聃龄,于海霞.儿童的直接推理能力及策略的发展[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):558-562. 被引量:7
  • 2林崇德,沃建中,陈浩莺.小学生图形推理策略发展特点的研究[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):2-8. 被引量:18
  • 3Steinberg.(1999).超越IQ—人类智力的三元理论.上海.华东师范大学出版社.
  • 4Andersen, E. B. (1985). Estimating latent correlations between repeated testings. Psychomeadk, 50, 3-16.
  • 5Campbell. C., & Carlson. J. S. (1995). The dynamic assessment of mental abiliges, J.S.Carlson(Eds.) Advances in cognition and educational practice: Eruopean contributions to dynamic assessment. JAIPress Inc. 3,1-31.
  • 6Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures:A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test.Psychologlcal Review, 4(3),404-413.
  • 7Daly, J. J. (1997). Idcntigcation of cognitive processes in a fluid intelligence measure and response by older adults to targeted trffning. Unpublicshed doctorial dissertation, The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron.
  • 8DiBeUo. L.V, Roussos. L. A. & william S. (2007). Review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models. Handbook of Statlstics, 26, 979-1030.
  • 9Embretson, S. E. (1991). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometdka, 56(3) 495-515.
  • 10Embretn, S. E. (2002). The second centmy of ability testing: Some predictions and speculations. ETS research reports.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部