外商直接投资对中国工业部门的外溢效应分析——基于分位数回归法被引量：8

Spillover Effect of FDI in China's Industrial Sector:An Analysis based on the Quantile Regression Approach

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文使用分位数回归法重新审视了外资对中国工业部门的技术溢出。分地区的研究表明:只有当内资工业产出处于高分位数,即具备了较高生产规模时,人力资本和市场竞争对技术溢出的正向影响才会显著;内企与外企的技术差距在我国东、中、西部区域均是不利于FDI技术溢出的,并且,随着内资工业产出向高分位数变化,技术差距对技术溢出的负向影响逐渐减弱;在不同地区和分位数位置,开放度和投资环境对FDI溢出的影响呈现出较大差异。 Based on quantile regression,this paper reexamines the spillover effect of FDI in China's industry sector.The result shows that the positive effect of human capital and market competition is significant at the top of the conditional distribution.Technological gap is unfavorable to FDI spillover at different regions of China.And the negative effect is most insignificant at the top of conditional distribution.As for openness and investment environment,the effect of both factors on FDI spillover varies at different regions or quantiles.

作者涂涛涛

机构地区华中农业大学经济管理学院

出处《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第8期56-60,共5页 World Economy Studies

关键词分位数回归外商直接投资技术外溢

分类号 F832.6 [经济管理—金融学] F424 [经济管理—产业经济] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献18

1Alfaro, L. , Chanda, A. , Ozcan K. S. , Sayek, S. FDI and Economic Growth: The Role of Local Markets [ J ]. Journal of International Economics, 2004(64) :89-112.
2Borensztein, E. , Gregorio, J. D. , Lee, J.W. How Does FDI Affect Economic Growth[ J]. Journal of International Economics, 1998, 45(1): 115-135.
3Dimelis, S. , H. Louri. Foreign direct investment and efficiency benefits: A conditional quantile analysis [ J]. Oxford Economic Papers, 2002(54) : 449-469.
4Gerschenberg, I. The Training and Spread of Managerial Knowhow: A Comparative. Analysis of Multinationals and Other Firms in Kenya[J]. World Development, 1987(15) :931-939.
5Girma, S. , H. Gorg. Foreign direct investment, spillovers and absorptive capacity: Evidence from quantile regressions. IIIS Discussion Paper No. 01, 2003.
6Girma, S. , H. Gorg. Foreign direct investment, spillovers and absorptive capacity: Evidence from quantile regressions. Kiel Working Paper No. 1248, 2005.
7Holmes, J. , Schmitz, A. Competition at Work: Railroads vs. Monopoly in the US Shipping Industry [ J ]. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 2001,25 (2) :3-29.
8Keller, W. International Technology Diffusion[ J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, 42 (3) :752-782.
9Kinoshita, Y. R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. William Davidson Institute Working Papers No. 349, 2000.
10Koenker, R., Bassett, G. Regression Quantiles[J]. Econometrica, 1978, 46( 1 ) :33-49.

二级参考文献49

1赖明勇,包群,彭水军,张新.外商直接投资与技术外溢:基于吸收能力的研究[J].经济研究,2005,40(8):95-105. 被引量：380
2Soto, Marcelo (2000): Capital Flows and Growth in Developing Countries : Recent Empirical Evidence. OECD Development Center, July 2000.
3Moschos, D. (1989): "Export Expansion, Growth and the Level of Economic Development:An Empirical Analysis",Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 93--102.
4Evenson R and Westphal L, 1995, "Technological Change and Technological Strategy", In Behrman and Sfinivasan eds, Handbook of Development, vol (3), Elsevier, Armsterdam.
5Grossman, G. and E. Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the World Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge.
6Heckman J. , 2003, "China's Investment in Human Capital, Economic Development and Cultural Change", 795-804.
7Keller W. ,2001, "International Technology Diffusion", NBER Working Paper No,8573.
8Romer P. M. , 1990, "Endogenous Technological Change", Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71-102.
9Xu B., 2000, "Multinational Enterprises, Technology Diffusion, and Host Country Productivity Growth", Journal of Development Economics 62, 477-493.
10Borensztein. E, Gregorio J. D and Lee J-W, 1998, "How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth"? Journal of International Economics 45, 115-135.