期刊文献+

健侧C7神经根联合多组神经移位治疗全臂丛神经根性撕脱伤46例 被引量:1

Multiple donor nerves transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus total roots avulsion of 46 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨健侧C7联合多组神经移位治疗臂丛神经根性撕脱伤的方法和疗效。方法对46例全臂丛根性撕脱伤患者采用健侧C7神经根、膈神经、副神经、肋间神经移位治疗,并进行长期随访,观察肩外展、屈肘、屈指和手部感觉功能恢复的情况。结果46例平均随访(4.60±1.25)年。肩外展>30°占59.1%(26/44)。屈肘恢复的总有效率为73.9%(34/46);屈腕指动作恢复有效率为45.7%(21/46),其中肌力≥M3者13例,优良率为28.3%(13/46)。手部感觉恢复有效率为54.3%(25/46)。肋间神经修复胸背神经,38例有不同程度肌力恢复,占82.6%(38/46),其中肌力≥M3者29例,有效率为63.0%(29/46)。结论健侧C7联合多组神经移位治疗全臂丛根性撕脱伤可获得较好疗效。 Objective To report the methods and long-term outcomes of contralateral C7 nerve and multiple donor nerves transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus total roots avulsion. Methods Forty-six patients with brachial plexus total roots avulsion were treated by phrenic, accessory, intercostals nerve and contralateral C7 nerve neurotization. The long-term out- comes of shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist and finger flexion and recovery of latissmus dorsi were analysed. Results The follow-up period was averaged (4.60±1.25) year. Shoulder abduction more than 30 degree was achieved in 59.1% (26/ 44) of the patients. The excellent and good elbow flexion was achieved in 73.9% (34/46) of the patients. Wrist and finger flexion recovered in45.7% (21/46) patients, and good rate was 28. 3% (13/46). Hand protective sensory recovered in 54. 3% (25/46) of the patients. Latissmus dorsi recovered in 82.6% (38/46) of the patients, and good rate was 63.0% (29/ 46). Conclusion Contralateral C7 nerve and Multiple donor nerves neurotization is a good method for the treatment of brachial plexus total roots avulsion.
出处 《福建医药杂志》 CAS 2008年第4期1-4,共4页 Fujian Medical Journal
基金 福建省科技厅青年科技人才创新项目(2004J071) 福建省科技厅科技计划重点项目(2000Z122)
关键词 臂丛神经 损伤 神经移位 Brachial plexus Injury Nerves transfer
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1徐杰,顾玉东,成效敏,董震,劳杰,陈亮.比较两种带血供长段尺神经移植术神经再生远期结果的实验研究[J].中华手外科杂志,2001,17(2):78-80. 被引量:9
  • 2徐杰,顾玉东,成效敏,董震.带尺侧上副动脉尺神经转位的解剖及临床意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2001,19(2):108-110. 被引量:14
  • 3Narakas AO, Hents VR. Neurotization in brachial plexus injuries, indication and results. Clin Orthop 1988, 237: 43-56.
  • 4Chuang DC, Lee GW, Hashem F, et al. Restoration of shoulder abduction by nerve transfer in avulsed brachial plexus injury: evaluation of 99 patients with various nerve transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg., 1995, 96 (1): 122-124.
  • 5董震,成效敏,王欢,肖文焕,顾玉东.肱二头肌和三角肌肌支在臂丛的定位及其临床意义[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,1999,17(3):223-224. 被引量:8
  • 6Nakatuchi Y, Saitou S, Hosaka M, et al. Reconstruction of sensory function for brachial plexus palsy. J Jpn Soc Surg Hand, 1988, 5 (1): 156-160.
  • 7Nagano A, Tsuyama N, Ochiai N, et al. Direct nerve crossing with the intercostal nerve to treat avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus. J Hand Surg, 1989, 14 (6) 980-985.
  • 8Ogino T, Naito T. Intercostal nerve crossing to restore elbow flexion and sensibility of the hand for a root avulsion type of brachial plexus injurry. Microsurg, 1995, 16 (6): 571- 577.
  • 9Gu YD, Chen DS, Zhang GM, et al. Long term functional results of contralateral C7 transfer. J Reconst Mcrosurg, 1998, 14 (1) : 57-58.
  • 10Walkakul S, Orapin S, and Van-Adurongwan V. Clinical results of controlateral C7 root neurotization to the median nerve in brachial plexus injuries with total root avulsions.J Hand Surg, 1999, 24 (5): 556-560.

二级参考文献10

共引文献45

同被引文献46

引证文献1

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部