摘要
ADR应用于行政纠纷解决领域,不但关涉公共资源配置和公民利用司法的权利问题,更涉及行政权、司法权和立法权之间的分权关系以及法治原则等重要宪法原则,必然会引发关于合宪性的关注与审视。ADR合宪性命题的证成是推广应用ADR的必经之路。在法律移植层面上,作为一种在不同的法律秩序中完成同一功能的规则,美国行政纠纷解决中ADR合宪性之确立,为学界探究我国多元化行政纠纷解决机制提供了一种比较与借鉴的视角。
When applying alternative dispute resolution （hereinafter referred to as ADR） to administrative disputes , great attention and review have been attracted over the constitutionality of it. That＇s mainly because the problems involved are complicated. Not only the application of ADR is dealing with both allocation of public resources and citizen＇s right of accessing to justice, but also it has a bearing on the triangular administration-justice-legislation relationship, not to mention some important constitutional doctrines such as the rule of law. Given this situation, to demonstrate ADR＇s constitutionality is the only way out for its general applicability in administrative dispute resolution. Therefore, the successful demonstration in U. S. A can probably offer us some reference methods and views in exploring our path to the diversity of administrative dispute resolution.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第10期89-95,共7页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
ADR
行政纠纷
合宪性
alternative dispute resolution
administrative dispute
constitutionality
