期刊文献+

日本资产证券化中特殊目的机构信用评级的法律问题 被引量:1

Legal Issues on Rating of Special Purpose Vehicle in Japanese Securitization Transactions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 资产证券化特殊目的机构(SPV)的信用评级,关键在于确定其实现破产隔离的程度如何,对不同组织形式的SPV,其破产隔离实现程度是不一样的。一般说来,对SPV的信用评级主要从SPV的章程、组织结构、商业活动范围、法律地位等方面来评价,对上述因素加以考虑,不同组织形式的SPV破产隔离的程度评价又是不一致的。进行评级时考虑的因素以及SPV的组织形式的影响对中国未来进行SPV的相关立法具有重要的参考意义。 the bankruptcy remoteness of SPV, which is of significance to the rating of securitization transaction, is required in different degree in accordance with various categories of SPV. In general, the rating of SPV in seeuritization transactions is conducted according to its object and limitation, organization, legal status, &. c, and is done by considering different factors concerning the various concrete organization of SPV. These factors will make good reference for the legislation of SPV or securitization.
作者 张琼
机构地区 武汉大学出版社
出处 《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第5期731-735,共5页 Wuhan University Journal:Philosophy & Social Science
关键词 特殊目的机构 信用评级 一般标准 特殊标准 SPV rating of credit general criteria specific criteria
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1甘勇.美国资产证券化中若干法律问题研究[J].法学评论,2005,23(3):146-151. 被引量:14
  • 2Schwarcz, S. L. 1991. "Structuring and Legal Issues of Asset Securitization in the United States", in Norton, J. J. & P. R. Spellman (ed. ). Asset Securitization : International Financial and Legal Perspective. London : Blackwell Publishers.
  • 3于敏.《最新日本公司法》.杨东译,北京:法律出版社,2006年版.
  • 4Boerger, G. H. 2003. Special Report on Securitization in Asia and the Pacific Rim. New York: Lightning Source Inc.

二级参考文献10

  • 1S.L. Schwarcz,"The Alchemy of Asset Smiritization", in Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance, Vol. 1 (1994),pp. 133- 134.
  • 2C.A. Hill, "Securitization: a Low - Cost Sweetener for Lemons", Washington University Law Quarterly, Vol. 74(1996), pp. 1086- 1090.
  • 3T.W. Albrecht& S. J. Smith, " Corporate Loan Securitization:Selected Legal and Regulatory Issues", Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, Vol. 8 (1998), pp. 411- 422.
  • 4P.R. Wood, Tide Finance, Derivatives, Securitization, Set-Off and Netting, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1995, pp.42 - 50.
  • 5Delaware General Corporation Law §§ 102(b)(1), 121.
  • 6S.L. Schwarcz, "Structuring and Legal Issues of Asset Securitization in the United States", in J. J. Norton & P. R.Spellman (ed.), Asset Securitization: International Financial and Legal Perspective, London: Blackwell Publishers, 1991, pp. 4 -25.
  • 7R.D. Aicher & W. J. Fellerhoff, "Characterization of a Transfer of Receivables as a Sale or a Secured Loan upon Bankruptcy of the Transfer" , American Bankruptcy Law Journal, Vol. 65 (1991), pp. 186 - 188.
  • 8J.J. Norton & P. R. Spellman, Asset Securitization: International Financial and Legal Perspective, London: Blackwell Publishers, 1991, pp. 29- 30.
  • 9S. L. Schwarcz, The Impact on Securitization of Revised UCC Article9, Chicago-Kent LawReview, Vol. 74 (1999),pp. 960-961.
  • 10S. V. Bazinas,"An International Legal Regime for Receivables Financing: UNCITRAL's Contribution", Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law , Vol. 8 (1998), pp. 319- 320.

共引文献13

同被引文献1

  • 1Schwarcz S L. Structuring and Legal Issues of Asset Secu- ritization in the United States [ M ]. London: Blackwell Publishers ,2009.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部