美国大学终身教职后评审制度的兴起、模式与走向被引量：2

Post-tenure Review in American University:Its Rising,Patterns,and Tendency

下载PDF

导出

摘要兴起于20世纪90年代的美国终身教职后评审制度是在高校问责制、终身教职受到批评和高等教育财政紧缩三大压力下的共同产物。它分为年度评审、综合评审和目标评审三种形式。在终身教职后评审已经普遍实施的情形下,需要详加思考:职后评审是积极的还是"附加的"?具有高度利益关系还是重在职业发展?谁接受评估?谁来评估? Rising in the 1990s, post-tenure review is the outcome of the criticism on the system of accountability, tenure, and fiscal tight in American universities. Post-tenure review falls into three categories, i.e., annual review, comprehensive review, and triggered review. Therefore, some issues are worth further investigating. For example, the purpose of post-tenure is positive or 'add-on'? Does it focus on high-stake evaluation or professional growth? Who gets evaluated? Who performs the evaluation?

作者王春艳

机构地区浙江大学教育学院

出处《高教发展与评估》 CSSCI 2008年第5期93-98,118,共7页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation

关键词美国大学终身教职终身教职后评审 American universities tenure post-tenure review

分类号 G649.712 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1Margaret A. Miller. State-Level Post-tenure Review Policies[J]. Innovative Higher Edueation,Vol. 24,No. 1 ,Fall 1999: 17-24.
2Sehmidt, P. Governors Want Fundamental Changes in Colleges, Question Place of Tenure [J]. Chronicle of Higher Education. 1998,Vol. 44 ,Issue 41. PA38.
3Joseph C. Morreale. Post tenure Review.. Evaluating Teaching [EB/OL]. http://www. aeenet. edu/resources/chairs 2008-1-23.
4Post-tenure review : an AAUP Response [EB/OL]. http://www. aaup. org/NR/rdonlyres/ BBF5E3D5-5A39-4265-B1B9-FD59FE4AC70C/0/PostTenureReviewAnAAUPResponse. pdf2008-03-02.
5王正青,徐辉.美国高校终身教职后评估制度的兴起、内涵及其评价[J].高等教育研究,2006,27(3):92-96. 被引量：8

二级参考文献9

1EUBEN DONNA R. (2002) Tenure: Current Perspective and Challenges[EB/OL]. http://www.aaup. org/Academe/index. btm.
2JEFFER D APER, JUDITH E FRY. Post-tenure review at graduate institution in the United States[J].The Journal of Higher Education, 2003,74, (3).
3LICATA CHRISTINE M. Post-Tenure Faculty Evaluation[EB/OL].http://www.cricdigests.org/pre-926/tenure.htm.
4M A MILLER. State-level post-tenure review policies[J]. Innovative Higher Education, 1999,24(1).
5Post-tenure review, An AAUP response[J], Academe, 1998,84(5),
6Post-Tenure Review Analyzed[EB/OL]. http://www.apsanet.org/content_9873.cfm
7DONNA EUBEN. Post-Tenure Review: Some Case Law [EB/OL]. http://www.aaup.org/Legal/info%A 20outlines/legposttenure.htm.
8GOODMAN MADELEINE J. The review of tenured faculty[J]. The Journal of Higher Education,1990,61(4).
9WILLLIAM M PLATER. A Profession at Risk[J].Change, 2001, 33 (4).