期刊文献+

市场化认同、贸易报复与反倾销 被引量:12

Market-oriented Reform Acceptability, Trade Retaliation and Antidumping
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究反倾销的文献大多从调查国的角度出发,考虑哪些因素会引致一国反倾销调查。文章从被调查国的角度出发,利用美国对华反倾销数据和泊松回归模型进行实证研究得出,中国的市场化改革降低了美国对华反倾销频度,但其经济显著性不明显;美国对中国贸易依赖指数提高会降低对华反倾销频度;美国对华FDI增加和中国加入WTO反而提高了对华反倾销频度;中国反倾销立法的制定对美国对华反倾销频度的影响没有通过统计显著性检验。 Literatures on antidumping mostly considered the influencing factors of antidumping investigations and affirmative verdicts from investigation Country. On the side of investigated country, this paper uses poisson regression and concludes that Chinese marker-oriented reform decreases the number of antidumping investigation from America, but its economic significance is indistinetive. The increasing trade interdependence index decreases the number of antidumping investigation. Entering WTO induces and the increase of EDI arouse reversely an increase of antidumping investigation because China lacked the experience of appealing to DSB. The hypothesis that constituting Chinese antidumping bill decreases the number of antidumping investigation doesn't pass statistical significance,
出处 《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第10期120-126,共7页 Journal of International Trade
基金 南京大学张二震教授主持的教育部应急课题《经济全球化与中国改革开放的历史进程和基本经验研究》(批准号:2008JYJ007) 2008年度国家社会科学基金重点项目《外贸顺差问题研究》的阶段性成果(批准号:08AJY004)
关键词 反倾销 贸易报复 市场化改革 Antidumping Trade retaliation Market-oriented reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1刘航滨.外国对华反倾销过程中的各类博弈[J].世界经济文汇,2001(3):25-29. 被引量:11
  • 2谢建国.经济影响、政治分歧与制度摩擦——美国对华贸易反倾销实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(12):8-17. 被引量:110
  • 3樊纲,王小鲁.《中国市场化指数——各地区市场化相对进程2004年度报告》,经济科学出版社,2004年.
  • 4Aggarwal A., (2004) “Macro Economics Determinants of Antidumping: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries,” World Development 32, 1043-1057.
  • 5Blonigen, B. A., and Bown, C., (2003) "Anti-dumping and Retaliation Threats," Journal of International Economics 60, 249-273.
  • 6Knetter, M. M., and Prusa, T..J., (2003) “Macroeconomic Factors and Anti-dumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries,” Journal of International Economics 61, 1-17.
  • 7Krupp, C., (1994) “Antidumping Cases in the US Chemical Industry: A Panel Data Approach,”The Jourual of Industrial Economics 42, 299-311.
  • 8Mah, J.S., (2000) "Antidumping Decisions and Macroeconomic Variables in the USA," Applled Economics 32, 1701-1709.
  • 9Lee, K.H., and Mah, J.S., (2003) "Institutional Changes and Antidumping Decisions in the United States," Journal of Policy Modeling 25,.555-565.
  • 10Mah, J.S., (2006) "ITC Decisions on Antidumping Duties Under the WTO," Applied Economics Letters 13, 73-76.

二级参考文献34

共引文献975

同被引文献132

引证文献12

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部