摘要
目的：观察比较布洛芬混悬液与复方氨林巴比妥注射液的临床疗效。方法：选择有高热症状的急性上呼吸道感染患儿（腋温≥39．5℃）120例随机分成布洛芬混悬液治疗组80例和复方氨林巴比妥注射液对照组40例治疗。结果：治疗组总有效率98．75％，对照组总有效率85．00％（Х^2=9．19，P〈0．05）。治疗组退热疗效评分均数为2．98±0．18，对照组退热疗效评分为2．72±0．64，两者比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。用药后1～4h两组退热效果比较差异有统计学意义（P均〈0．01）。结论：布洛芬混悬液退热快、作用强、维持时间长，对咽痛、头痛也有缓解疗效。
Objective：To observe and compare the curative effects between ibuprofen suspension and compound aminophenazone and barbital. Methods： 120 cases of children with hyperpyrexia （armpit temperature ≥39.5 ℃ ） and acute upper respiratory tract infection were divided into two groups at random. The treatment group of 80 cases were treated with ibuprofen suspension and the control group of 40 cases with compound aminophenazone and barbital injection. Results： In the treatment group, the marked efficiency was 92.5% （74/80）, efficiency 6.25% （5/80）, ineffiency 1.25% （ 1/80）, and the total efficiency 98.75% ; in the 40 cases of the control group significant efficiency was 67.5% （27/40）, efficiency 17.5% （7/40）, ineffiency 15% （6/40）, total efficiency rate 85.00%. According to the general judgement criterion of curative effect about reducing temperature, the average value for ibuprofen was 2.98 ±0. 18, the value for compound aminophenazone and barbital injection 2.72 ± 0.64, which showed significant difference statistically. Conclusions： Ibuprofen suspension can effectively reduce temperature and maintain a longer time and also relieves angina and headache.
出处
《儿科药学杂志》
CAS
2008年第5期46-47,共2页
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacy
关键词
布洛芬混悬液
复方安林巴比妥注射液
上呼吸道感染
发热
儿童
Ibuprofen suspension
Aminophenazone and barbital injection
Upper respiratory infection
Hyperpyrexia
Children
