期刊文献+

精神障碍犯罪嫌疑人刑事责任能力评定结果分析

The assessment analysis of the criminal responsibility in the mentally ill offenders
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨影响精神障碍犯罪嫌疑人刑事责任能力评定的相关因素。方法通过回顾性病例对照研究,采用简明精神症状评定量表(BPRS)和精神障碍犯罪嫌疑人刑事责任能力量表,对147例精神障碍犯罪嫌疑人进行评定,并分为无刑事责任能力组(91例)和有刑事责任能力组(56例)。结果无刑事责任能力组BPRS的总分和思维障碍、激活性、敌对猜疑等因子分分别为(45.23±7.88)分、(17.23±4.49)分、(4.80±2.04)分、(8.18±3.21)分,高于有刑事责任能力组的(31.16±9.32)分、(8.18±5.19)分、(3.89±1.67)分、(5.36±3.23)分,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。逐步判别分析显示,既往精神病史(x2)、鉴定诊断(X3)、BPRS中的思维障碍(X6)、激活性(X7)、及精神病人刑事责任能力量表中分别反映作案时情况的因子2(X10)、对作案后对后果认识的因子3(X11)、作案后对自我保护能力因子4(X12)、疾病严重程度因子5(X13)等8个变量是精神障碍犯罪嫌疑人刑事责任能力评定量表的主要影响因子。结论精神障碍种类、精神症状及其严重程度、作案时的诱因、作案后对其后果认识、作案后的自我保护能力等因素是精神障碍犯罪嫌疑人刑事责任能力的主要影响因素。 Objective To analyze the assessment resuhs of the criminal responsibility of the mentally ill offenders. Methods A case control study was employed in the current study. BPRS, Criminal Responsibility Scale were used to investigate the 147 criminal cases evaluated by forensic psychiatrists from January 2005 to January 2006 in the 5 tb hospital of Nanning city, Guangxi province. Results ( 1 ) There was a significant difference between the responsibility group and no-responsibility group in the BPRS total score(45.23 ±7.88 vs 31.16 ± 9. 32 ), factor 3 ( 17.23 ± 4.49 vs 8.18 ± 5.19 ), factor 4 (4.80± 2.04 vs 3.89±1.67 ), factor 5 ( 8.18 ± 3.21 vs 5.36 ± 3.23). (2) By the discriminatory analysis, the 8 variables such as psychiatric history, psychiatric diagno- sis, the BPRS factor 3 and 4, the Responsibility Scale factors 3,4, and 5 were selected into the discriminatory equations. Conclusions 1. The study suggested that the psychiatric diagnosis, psychopathology and its severity of the disorders, the criminal motivation, understand of the consequence and the ability of self-protection play an important role in assessing the criminal responsibility of the mentally ill offenders. 2. The study confirmed Criminal Responsibility Scale had the excellent credible and effective degree. And it can be widely used in the assessment of criminal responsibility of the mentally ill offenders.
作者 唐全胜
出处 《中国行为医学科学》 CSCD 2008年第10期893-895,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science
关键词 精神障碍犯罪嫌疑人 刑事责任能力评定量表 判别分析 Mentally ill offenders Criminal responsibility scale Discriminatory analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献26

  • 1邵阳,谢斌,蔡伟雄,卞茜,郑瞻培,黄富银,张钦廷.暴力作案刑事责任能力评定量表的应用[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(6):324-327. 被引量:7
  • 2沈渔邨.精神病学(第3版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.670.
  • 3威尔逊.论人的天性[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1987.20.
  • 4石华孟.将限定责任能力分为二级评定原则的再探讨[J].中华精神科杂志,2002,35:51-51.
  • 5韩臣柏,王菊芬,翟书涛,王增良,李小力.精神分裂症患者凶杀行为的犯罪学特征对照研究[J].中华精神科杂志,1997,30(1):25-27. 被引量:37
  • 6王小平,蒋少艾.精神分裂症患者责任能力相关因素研究[A].见:中华医学会精神科分会司法精神病学组.第七届全国司法精神病学学术会议论文汇编[C].南京:2001.43-45.
  • 7谢斌,郑瞻培,王士清,等.暴力作案刑事责任能力的量化评定[A].见:中华医学会精神科分会司法精神病学组.第七届全国司法精神病学学术会议论文汇编[C].南京:2001.20-29.
  • 8Krakowski M, Volavka J, Brizer D. Psychopathology and violence: A review of the literature[ J ]. Compr Psychiatry, 1986,27:131-148.
  • 9Matteo B,Giulia B,Michele T,et al.Identification of depression by medical and surgical general hospital physicians.General Hospital Psychiatry,2002,24:4-11
  • 10Mark H,Robert B.The Merk manual of Diagonisis and Therapy.Seventeenth Edition,1999,15 (189):90

共引文献2931

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部