期刊文献+

DFCOS-Ⅱ型人工瘤胃模拟活体牛瘤胃发酵的效果评价

Evaluation on Fermentation Effect of DFCOS-II Artificial Rumen Simulating Living Rumen
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以活体为对照,对DFCOS-Ⅱ人工瘤胃模拟活瘤胃发酵效果进行评价。结果表明:该装置模拟瘤胃试验需3~4d的适应期,4—8d发酵状态相对稳定,效果较好,且与活体瘤胃值呈一定规律性变化。 Taking living body as control, the fermentation effect of DFCOS - Ⅱ artificial rumen simulating living rumen was evaluated. The results indicated that the test of simulating living rumen by this device needed an backgrounding period of 3 - 4 d, the fermented state for 4 - 8 d was relatively stable with a good effect, and was changed in a certain regularity with living mmen value.
出处 《粮食与饲料工业》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第11期35-37,共3页 Cereal & Feed Industry
关键词 黄牛 人工瘤胃 活体瘤胃 厌氧真菌 双外流连续培养系统 发酵参数 中性洗涤纤维消化率 效果评价 artificial rumen living rumen anaerobic fungus fermentation parameter NDF rate of digestion evaluation of results
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1孟庆翔.双外流连续培养系统用于瘤胃发酵的体外模拟:技术综述[J].动物营养学报,1999,11(S1):45-50. 被引量:26
  • 2施学士.不同饲养制度下乳用山羊瘤胃内纤毛虫种群与pH值和氧化还原电位在体内外条件下的变化[A].见:南京农学院硕士学位论文[C].南京:南京农业大学,1982.
  • 3Joblin K N. Isolation, Enumeration, and Maintenance of Rumen Anaerobic Fungi in Roll Tubes Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1981,42(6) :1 119-1 122.
  • 4Orpin G C. Studies on the Rumen Flagellate Neocallimastix Frontallis[ ] ]. Gen Microbiol, 1976,91:249-62.
  • 5龚利敏,孟庆翔.中国黄牛瘤胃厌氧真菌的分离纯化及形态学初步观察[J].畜牧兽医学报,1997,28(6):489-493. 被引量:9
  • 6Fonty G, Grenet E. Effects of Diet on the Fungi Population of the Digestive Tract of Ruminent [A]. In: Montford D O, Opin C G. Anaerobiol Fungi: Biology and Function [ C ]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994.
  • 7Meng Q. Effect of Dilution Rate and Fermentable Structural Polycsaccharide to Protein Ratrio on Mictrobial Efficiency in Continuous Culture[J]. J Anim Sci, 1995,73:262.
  • 8石彩霞.DFCOS-Ⅱ型人工瘤胃模拟瘤胃发酵模式及细菌培养的效果评价[A].内蒙古农业大学硕士学位论文[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2004.
  • 9王加启,冯仰廉.瘤胃持续模拟技术的研究[J].动物营养学报,1995,7(1):29-35. 被引量:14

二级参考文献12

  • 1Goering HK,PJVanSoest.ForageFiberAnalyese(Apparatus,Reagents,Procedures,andSomeApplications). . 1970
  • 2HungateRE.TheRumenanditsMicrobes. . 1966
  • 3MengQM,SKerley,PALudden,RLBelyea.Fermentationsubstrateanddilutionrateinteracttoaffectmicrobialgrowthandefficiency. JAnim.Sci . 1999
  • 4MenkeKH,LRaab,ASalewski,HSteingass,DFritz,WSchneider.Theestimationofdigestibilityandmetabolizableenergycontentofruminentfeedstuffsfromgasproductionwhentheyareincubatedwithrumenliquorinvitro. JAgricSci . 1979
  • 5OwensFN,ALGoetch.RuminalFermentation. TheRuminantAnimalDigestivePhysiologyandNutrition . 1988
  • 6SlyterLL.FermentationFrustration. 1990.MeetingoftheNortheastADSA -ASAS . 1990
  • 7SternMD,MIEndres.TheDualFlowContinuousCultureSyetem. LaboratoryManual:ReseachTechniquesinRuminantNutrition . 1991
  • 8Tilley JMS,RATerry.Atwo -stagetechniquefortheinvitrodigestionofgoragecrops. JBrit.GrasslSoc . 1963
  • 9Goering HK,PJVanSoest.ForageFiberAnalyese(Apparatus,Reagents,Procedures,andSomeApplications). Agric.HandbookNo.379 . 1970
  • 10孟庆翔,Monty S.Kerley.瘤胃稀释率对蛋白质发酵和微生物生长效率的影响[J].中国农业科学,1998,31(3):72-78. 被引量:6

共引文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部